Immunophenotypic Characteristics of ZNF384 Rearrangement Compared with BCR-ABL1, KMT2A Rearrangement, and Other Adult B-cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Ya-Zhe Wang,Ya-Zhen Qin,Yan Chang,Xiao-Ying Yuan,Wen-Min Chen,Ling-Ling He,Le Hao,Wei-Hua Shi,Qian Jiang,Hao Jiang,Xiao-Jun Huang,Yan-Rong Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.b.22086
2022-01-01
Abstract:Background ZNF384 rearrangement has been recently identified as a new subtype of B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL). However, comprehensive studies clarifying immunophenotypic features and discriminating them from non-ZNF384 in adult BCP-ALL remain scarce to date. Methods Flow cytometric assessments were retrospectively performed in 43 patients with ZNF384 rearrangement, 45 with BCR-ABL1, 29 with KMT2A rearrangement and 44 with other BCP-ALL in the analysis cohort. Results CD33- and CD13-positive frequencies were significantly higher in patients with ZNF384 rearrangement than in those with non-ZNF384; however, no significant difference was observed in CD10- and CD123-positive frequencies. Analysis of antigen-positive cell proportion and median fluorescence intensity (MFI) further indicated that patients with ZNF384 rearrangement had significantly lower CD10 and higher CD33, CD13, and CD123 proportion and MFI. However, compared with KMT2A rearrangement, the CD10 expression in patients with ZNF384 rearrangement was higher, with the median percentage and MFI of 36.16 (3.63-94.79)% versus 4.53 (0.03-21.00)%, and 4.50 (0.86-32.26) versus 2.06 (0.87-4.04), respectively (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, compared with BCR-ABL1 and other BCP-ALL, ZNF384 rearrangement had significantly higher CD33 and CD13 proportion and MFI (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.05, respectively). In addition, higher CD123 proportion and MFI in ZNF384 rearrangement than those in the other three groups were reported for the first time (p < 0.01). A flow cytometry scoring system, including CD10%, CD33MFI, CD13%, and CD123MFI, was proposed and verified to predict ZNF384 rearrangement with high sensitivity and specificity, that is, 76.74% and 91.53% in the analysis and 87.50% and 91.30% in the validation cohort. Conclusions The multiparameter immunophenotypic scoring system could suggest ZNF384 rearrangement.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?