Abstract:Despite the versatility in modeling complex crack configurations, phase-field damage models for fracture usually count only on in-house codes, greatly restricting their potential applications. It is thus of vital importance to implement them in those commonly used commercial software packages like Abaqus. However, so far only the less robust Newton's monolithic algorithm or the inefficient staggered solver has been considered. In this work, taking the unified phase-field damage theory <a class="workspace-trigger" href="#b0300">[60]</a> as the particular example, we present three distinct strategies of implementing phase-field damage models into Abaqus: (i) UMAT-Newton-M: a thermo-mechanically coupled user-defined material (UMAT) implementation of the modified Newton monolithic solver; (ii) UEL-Staggered: a novel user-defined element (UEL) implementation of the iterative staggered (alternate minimization) algorithm with dummy dofs; (iii) UEL-BFGS: a UEL implementation of the recently advocated BFGS quasi-Newton monolithic algorithm. The aforesaid implementation strategies are then validated against several representative benchmark problems of brittle fracture and quasi-brittle failure. It is found that, the UMAT-Newton-M implementation is the simplest but not robust enough, while the UEL-Staggered implementation is robust but extremely inefficient. Comparatively, in all cases the UEL-BFGS scheme is of the best numerical performance with lest iterations and sufficient robustness. For the sake of reproducibility of the presented numerical results and the promotion of phase-field damage models, the source codes (programmed in the free format syntax of FORTRAN90) are also provided and interested users can download them at <a href="https://github.com/jianyingwu/pfczm-abaqus">https://github.com/jianyingwu/pfczm-abaqus</a>.

Scripts to Insert Cohesive Elements at the Matrix/Precipitate Interfaces in Representative Volume Elements in Abaqus

Scripts to Insert Cohesive Elements at the Interfaces Between Matrix and Precipitates with Irregular Shapes in Representative Volume Elements in ABAQUS

A Finite-Volume Implementation of the Phase-Field Model for Brittle Fracture with Adaptive Mesh Refinement

Finite Element Modelling of Complex 3D Static and Dynamic Crack Propagation by Embedding Cohesive Elements in Abaqus

Cohesive Cracking Simulation of Asphalt Mixture with Reflective Crack Through Xfem

THREE-DIMENSIONAL MESO-SCALE COHESIVE FRACTURE MODELING OF CONCRETE USING A PYTHON SCRIPT IN ABAQUS

Automatic simulation of the initiation and propagation of interface cracks and matrix cracks with VCFEM

A simple and robust Abaqus implementation of the phase field fracture method

3D Finite Element Simulation of Complex Static and Dynamic Fracture in Quasi-Brittle Materials

An Accurate and Efficient Augmented Finite Element Method for Arbitrary Crack Interactions

An ABAQUS toolbox for multiscale finite element computation

A Consistency-Check Based Algorithm for Element Condensation in Augmented Finite Element Methods for Fracture Analysis

Abaqus2Matlab: A suitable tool for finite element post-processing

EXTENDED FINITE ELEMENT METHOD BASED ON ABAQUS

FE Simulation of Metal Orthogonal Cutting Processes Based on 3D Adaptive Remeshing Procedure

Abaqus implementation of monolithic and staggered schemes for quasi-static and dynamic fracture phase-field model

A 3D Cohesive‐frictional Coupled Interface Model for Mesoscale Simulation of Steel Fibre‐reinforced Concrete

Simple projection method: a novel algorithm for estimation of characteristic element length in finite element simulations of composites

Comprehensive implementations of phase-field damage models in Abaqus

Cohesive Crack Model Based on Extended Finite Element Method

Analyzing Multiple Crack Propagation Using Extended Finite Element Method (X-FEM)