Abstract:Introduction The position of finger immobilization after flexor tendon rupture repair is changed to the extended position to prevent flexion contracture of the interphalangeal (IP) joint. However, in Strickland's assessment, We believe that a reduction in TAF (total active flexion) affects the outcome and that extension fixation is not necessarily the primary focus. For example, there are management methods that swap the fixed position between day and night. It is assumed that some effect is sought by placing the fingers in the flexed position. That is, the method of fixation is currently selected at individual facilities through twists and turns; however, the indications and criteria for selecting finger fixation positions are ambiguous, and they are apparently subject to the experience of therapists. This study aimed to characterize follow-up outcomes of flexion and extension fixation after zones I and II flexor tendon rupture repair. Methods This nonrandomized controlled trial with historical controls included 25 patients with flexor tendon ruptures of 30 fingers. The flexion fixation group consisted of 12 patients (n=16 fingers) and the extension fixation group consisted of 13 patients (n=14 fingers). The group with flexion fixation comprised patients who slept with their injured fingers in the flexed position (intervention group). The group with extension was retrospectively selected between April 2017 and March 2019, who slept with their injured finger in the extended position (historical control group). Strickland assessments of the range of motion (ROM) of each joint at the conclusion of hand therapy, the ratio of total active motion of the repaired, to the healthy finger (%TAF), and IP joint extension limitation angles were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests. Ratios of excellent and good ratings based on the Strickland assessment were compared using Fisher exact tests. Result The results of the Strickland assessment showed excellent or good outcomes for 22 (73%) of 30 fingers, which was in line with our previous findings. Strickland ratings of excellent were achieved in seven (44%) of 16 fingers and four (28%) of 14 fingers in the groups with flexion and extension fixation, respectively. The outcomes for two (22%) of 16 fingers and seven (78%) of 14 fingers in the groups with flexion and extension fixation were, respectively, rated as good. The proportion of patients rated as excellent was significantly higher in the group with flexion than extension fixation (p=0.040). The %TAF and the active flexion angle of the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint were higher in the group with flexion than extension fixation (p=0008 and p=0.025, respectively). Furthermore, the total angle of the IP joint limit of extension did not significantly differ between the groups. Conclusion Flexion fixation after flexor tendon rupture achieved an excellent Strickland rating and was more effective than extension fixation, especially in terms of the active flexion ROM of the DIP joint. Flexion fixation might be an alternative to extension fixation because the range of flexion should be greater and might provide a range of finger extension motion equivalent to that of extension fixation.

Clinical outcomes of extensor indicis proprius tendon transfer for extensor pollicis longus tendon rupture

Treatment for complete extensor tendon rupture: A case report on extensor pollicis longus tendon transfer and tenodesis procedure to radius for a patient with rheumatoid arthritis

Clinical Outcome Following Transfer of the Supinator Motor Branch to the Posterior Interosseous Nerve in Patients with C7-T1 Brachial Plexus Palsy.

A Retrospective Hospital-Based Study to Evaluate the Results of Extensor Tendon Injuries of the Hand, Wrist, and Forearm Treated Surgically in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Supinator to posterior interosseous nerve transfer to restore hand opening in brachial plexus and spinal cord injury: a systematic review and individual patient-data meta-analysis

Expected outcome for reconstructive hand surgery after spinal cord injuries related to level of injury and sex

Supinator to Posterior Interosseous Nerve Transfer for Recovery of Hand Opening in the Tetraplegic Patient: A Case Series

Clinical outcome of elbow extension restoration by posterior deltoid-to-triceps transfer in tetraplegia: a retrospective review of 51 patients

Anatomy of the extensor mechanism of the thumb in relation to the clinical presentation of extensor pollicis longus rupture

Favorable change in patient-reported outcomes following peroneus longus to brevis tendon transfer and lateral ankle ligament reconstruction

Combined Nerve and Tendon Transfers for C7-T1 Brachial Plexus Avulsion Injury.

Opponensplasty With Abductor Pollicis Brevis Rerouting for Types II and IIIA Hypoplastic Thumbs

Long head of biceps tendon augmentation in rotator cuff repair enhances tendon healing, shoulder function and patient-reported outcomes one-year post-surgery

Comparison of decrease in elbow flexion strength in patients after tenotomy and tenodesis of the long head of the biceps brachii

Functional evaluation after cortical button fixation for distal biceps ruptures - Is there any difference between manual or non-manual workers?

Comparison of Treatment Outcomes of Different Immobilized Finger Positions After Repair of Flexor Tendon Rupture in Zones I and II: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial With Historical Control Group

Multiple Nerve and Tendon Transfers: a New Strategy for Restoring Hand Function in a Patient with C7-T1 Brachial Plexus Avulsions

No-holes transpectoral tenodesis technique vs tenotomy of the long head of the biceps brachii

Mid-term outcomes of arthroscopically assisted lower trapezius tendon transfer using Achilles allograft in treatment of posterior-superior irreparable rotator cuff tear

Bowstringing of the extensor digitorum: clinical and biomechanical results using an ankle extensor retinaculum graft

Long-term outcomes of anterior latissimus dorsi tendon transfer for irreparable subscapularis tears