Two (or more?) dimensions of organizational commitment: Reexamination of the affective and continuance commitment scales.

Gail W. McGee,Robert C. Ford
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.72.4.638
IF: 11.8025
1987-11-01
Journal of Applied Psychology
Abstract:Two distinct views of organizational commitment have developed, one that regards it as attitudinal and the other as behavioral. Meyer and Allen (1984) acknowledged the importance of both approaches (labeling them affective and continuance commitment) and developed scales for measuring each. The present study reexamined some psychometric properties of these scales. The affective commitment scale appeared to be unidimensional and had good internal consistency reliability. For the continuance commitment scale, however, two distinct dimensions were identified. The first reflected commitment based on few existing employment alternatives, and the second reflected commitment based on personal sacrifice associated with leaving the organization. Affective commitment was correlated significantly and negatively with the first dimension (low alternatives) and significantly and positively with the second dimension (high personal sacrifice). Recommendations for future use of these scales are discussed.
psychology, applied,management
What problem does this paper attempt to address?