Monetized Wellbeing Losses from Air Pollution in China: 2004-2017

M. Liu,J. Bi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1289/isee.2020.virtual.p-1025

2020-01-01

ISEE Conference Abstracts

Abstract:Introduction: Benefiting from well-documented epidemiological evidence, the effects on mortality and morbidity are being incorporated into the decision process of pollution control in China. However, the attentions on the costs or benefits of subjective wellbeing (SWB) are still limited by insufficient knowledge on how air pollution affects the subjective dimension of wellbeing. Methods: Based on fortnightly questionnaire surveys in China from July 2014 to June 2016, this study first established the localized associations of SWB with the indicators of both income and air pollution levels. We further calculated the marginal substitution rate (MSR) between PM2.5 and income to evaluate the monetized SWB losses caused by 1 µg/m3 PM2.5 increase in 31 provinces. Finally, the valuation results were applied in assessing the monetized SWB losses attributable to PM2.5 in China during 2004-2017. Results: Objective air pollution had only indirect effects on SWB through risk perception. This challenged the traditional approaches that usually directly linked objective air pollution and wellbeing. On the national average, 1 µg/m3 annual PM2.5 increase was associated with 0.45-1.70 CNY wellbeing losses per capita per day. From 2004 to 2017, the year-by-year newly increased monetized wellbeing losses attributable to PM2.5 in China increased significantly before 2007 and then showed a slightly decreased trend with some fluctuations. Overall, the accumulated newly increased monetized wellbeing losses attributable to PM2.5 in China from 2004 to 2017 approximately accounted for 0.02% of accumulated gross domestic productions. The accumulated newly increased monetized wellbeing losses attributable to PM2.5 exhibited strong spatial variations with the high values in Henan, Shandong and Hebei, which overlapped with the spatial hotspots of PM2.5 related deaths. We recommended the government paid more attention to those areas. Conclusion: Huge wellbeing losses caused by air pollution shall be incorporated into the cost-benefits analysis framework as a new element.