Strategic Management Theory in a Post‐Pandemic and Non‐Ergodic World
Michael A. Hitt,Jean‐Luc Arregle,R. Michael Holmes
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12646
IF: 10.5
2020-10-18
Journal of Management Studies
Abstract:Fixed assets, especially those that are location bound, historically have been viewed as a source of competitive advantage. However, these assets are difficult to redeploy for alternative uses. Some firms may need to obtain more liquid and adaptable resources, which can support the reconfiguration of other resources. As one example, the stock of expensive office space, stores, or market‐seeking resources that firms have developed over decades may be less essential or may become a liability in the pandemic and post‐pandemic environment, as employees and customers become increasingly willing and able to perform activities (e.g., work and make purchases) remotely. Because intangible resources often are more flexible, they likely will take on added importance. Technology and human capital are perhaps the most critical resources on which redeployment and reconfiguration efforts depend. Thus, they may be critical for creating new capabilities to deal with the expected uncertainty in the New Normal environment. For example, Rindova and Courtney (2020) argued that firms can develop adaptive strategies or shaping strategies to deal with uncertainty. Whereas adaptive strategies help firms to identify attributes of uncertain markets and environments and to design ways to respond, shaping strategies help firms identify opportunities created by the uncertainties and exploit them proactively (Eisenhardt, in press). Ironically, although firms must innovate to compete in the New Normal environment, the economic recession and decline in the collocation of human capital (e.g., due to the increase in remote workers) has made innovation more difficult. Thus, although shaping strategies might be more important in the longer term, they also are more challenging and riskier. These observations suggest the following potential research questions: How do firms develop dynamic capabilities that allow them to change their resources and capabilities rapidly in the New Normal environment?How do firms avoid inertial tendencies and attempt to reduce their exposure to risks during major and difficult‐to‐foresee economic disruptions?Which firms earn higher returns over the longer term: those that engage in adaptive strategies or those that engage in shaping strategies during major economic disruptions?How might firms facilitate innovation, an activity often viewed as location bound, to a remote work environment?
management,business