Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the clinical significance of an optimized approach to improve surgical field visualization and simplify anastomosis techniques using robotic-assisted sleeve lobectomy for lung or bronchial carcinoma. Method: A total of 26 consecutive patients who underwent sleeve lobectomy between January 2017 and April 2020 were enrolled in the study. The cohort included 11 cases of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS group) and 15 cases of mini-thoracotomy (MT group). RAS was performed via an exclusive optimized approach utilizing the "3 to 4-6 to 8/9" four-port technique. Retrieved demographical and clinical data included operation time, anastomosis time, blood loss, chest drainage time and volume, postoperative pain scores, complications, white blood cell (WBC) levels, and duration of hospital stay and follow-up. Results: No cases of perioperative death were recorded. Compared to MT group, the RAS group had a similar anastomosis time (30.82 ± 6.08 vs 33.20 ± 7.73 min, respectively, p > 0.05) and shorter operation time (189.73 ± 36.41 vs 225.33 ± 38.19 min, respectively, p < 0.05). The RAS group had lower pain scores (4.23 ± 0.26 vs 4.91 ± 0.51, p < 0.05), lower levels of WBC (p < 0.05), and no anastomotic complications postoperatively. The RAS and MT groups demonstrated a successful bronchus reconstruction with low risk of angulation (1/11 vs 1/15, p > 0.05) and satisfactory disease-free survival (eight cases, 72.73% and 12 cases, 80%, respectively). Conclusion: The optimized approach to RA sleeve lobectomy is convenient and efficient and provides satisfactory clinical outcomes. Further study with a large sample size and evaluation of long-term survival are warranted. Key points: (i) we present a novel, convenient, and efficient approach for robotic-assisted sleeve lobectomy, ie, "3 to 4-6 to 8/9" four-port technique. The optimized approach for RA sleeve lobectomy is convenient and efficient and provides satisfactory clinical outcomes; (ii) details for the "3 to 4-6 to 8/9" four-port method: the assistant port was located at the fourth intercostal space. The 1-cm camera port was inserted at the sixth intercostal space in the posterior axillary line. The 0.5-cm da Vinci ports of the instrument arms were placed at the third intercostal space in the anterior axillary line and the eighth or ninth intercostal space in the posterior axillary line. The patient cart was inserted from the back of the patient's head and shoulders at 75° to the longitudinal line.

Robot-assisted Bronchial Sleeve Left Upper Lobectomy for Locally Advanced Bronchopulmonary Squamous Cell Carcinoma after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: a Case Report

Robotic Assisted Extended Sleeve Lobectomy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Sleeve Lobectomy with Bronchoplasty

Initial Experience of Robotic Sleeve Resection for Lung Cancer Patients

Robotic sleeve lobectomy for centrally located non-small cell lung cancer: A propensity score-weighted comparison with thoracoscopic and open surgery

Two‐port robotic sleeve lobectomy using Stratafix sutures for central lung tumors

Comparison of Sleeve Lobectomy for Lung Cancer Using Mini-Thoracotomy and an Optimized Robot-Assisted Technique

Case Report: Uniportal robot-assisted thoracoscopic double-sleeve lobectomy after neoadjuvant immunotherapy

Comparison of Robotic and Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Lung Cancer: a Propensity-Matched Analysis.

Robotic Sleeve Resection of the Airway: Outcomes and Technical Conduct Using Video Vignettes

Robot-assisted minimally invasive bronchial resection with primary anastomosis for schwannoma arising from left main bronchus: a case report

Robotic Sleeve Resection for Pulmonary Disease

Early Outcomes of Robotic Versus Thoracoscopic Segmentectomy for Early-Stage Lung Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Robotic Lung Cancer Surgery: from Simple to Complex, from Surgery to Clinical Study.

Techniques and Outcomes of Bronchoplastic and Sleeve Resection: an 8-Year Single-Center Experience.

Robotic-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: Left Upper Lobectomy

Comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery with thoracotomy in bronchial sleeve lobectomy for centrally located non-small cell lung cancer

Comparison of Bronchial Sleeve Lobectomy With Pulmonary Arterioplasty Versus Pneumonectomy

Deeper wedge resection and parenchymal-sparing bronchoplasty of the secondary carina: an alternative surgical technique for removal of tumor located at the orifice of upper lobar bronchus

Two different methods of bronchial dissection and coverage in robotic bilobectomy for advanced lung cancer

Robotic-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: Right Inferior Lobectomy