Sintilimab plus chidamide for relapsed/refractory (r/r) extranodal nk/t cell lymphoma (enktl): a prospective, multicenter, single‐arm, phase ib/ii trial (scent)

H. Huang,Y. Gao,X. Wang,B. Bai,L. Zhang,Y. Xiao,X. Liu,W. Li,Q. Cai,Z. Li,Y. Chen,W. Xu,R. Feng,H. Wu,J. Li,X. Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hon.127_2880
IF: 4.85
2021-01-01
Hematological Oncology
Abstract:Background: Patients with r/r ENKTL have a poor prognosis after failing asparaginase based regimen, and there is lack of effective treatment. ORIENT-4 trial demonstrated Sintilimab (a fully human anti-PD-1 antibody) was effective and well tolerated in r/r ENKTL(J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl; abstr 7504)). Chidamide, an oral subtype-selective histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) showed efficacy for r/r ENKTL. Moreover, accumulating evidences have shown the synergism between histone deacetylase inhibitor and anti-PD-1 antibody. This trial was designated to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the novel combination of Sintilimab plus Chidamide in r/r-ENKTL. Methods: This study enrolled patients with histologically confirmed r/r-ENKTL failed from asparaginase-based regimen. In Phase Ib, a standard “3+3” design was utilized to identify the MTD, DLT and recommended Phase II dosage (RP2D) of Chidamide plus Sintilimab. In phase II, patients received Sintilimab (200mg) plus Chidamide (RP2D) every 21 days for up to 1 year or until PD, intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was ORR assessed by investigators per RECIL 2017 criteria (NCT 03820596). Results: From March 2019 to January 2021, 38 eligible patients were enrolled in China. Of 37 response evaluable patients, 22 patients (59.5%) achieved an ORR including 18 (48.6%) patients with CR (Figure 1). With median follow-up time of 12.7 months (range, 0.9 to 21.5), the median TTR was 6.0 weeks (range, 5.0 to12.4) and median DOR was 13.3+ months (range, 1.3 to 19.2+, Figure 2). Estimated 18 months OS and PFS rate were 76.2% ± 6.9%, and 52.5% ± 8.7%, respectively. OS and PFS for patients with CR/PR were superior to SD/PD (P < 0.001, Figure 3). We assessed PD-L1 (22C3) expression by combined positivity score (CPS). The median CPS was 40.0, patients with CPS ≥ 30 exhibited benefit more from the combination than their counterparts with CPS < 30. Both ctDNA and EBV-DNA clearance had promising predictive value for survival. Twenty-five (65.8%) patients reported TRAEs. The most frequently observed (≥10%) TRAEs were neutropenia (65.8%), thrombocytopenia (44.4%), anemia (44.4%), hypothyroidism (47.4%), hypoproteinemia (36.8%), transaminase increased (26.3%), nausea and vomiting (26.2%). The most frequent Grade (G) ≥3 TRAEs were neutropenia (28.9%), thrombocytopenia (10.5%). Immune-related AEs were reported in 18 (47.4%) patients including a G4 exfoliative dermatitis and an interstitial pneumonia. TEAEs that led to permanent treatment discontinuation occurred in two (5.3%) patients. No death was related to the study drug. Conclusion: Sintilimab combined with Chidamide showed manageable safety profile and yielded effective antitumor activity, durable response in patients with r/r ENKTL for the first time. It is a promising therapeutic option for this population, especially for those with CPS ≥ 30. The combination of PD-1 antibody and HDACi may represents a novel strategy for r/r ENKTL. Further investigation is warranted. Best change in the SPD of target lesions from baseline for all patients in the evaluable set(n=37) Treatment exposure and response duration(n=38) OS and PFS. (A)OS of whole cohort. (B)PFS of whole cohort. (C)OS of CR/PR vs SD/PD. (D)PFS of CR/PR vs SD/PD The research was funded by: Innovent Biologics Inc. Keywords: Immunotherapy, Aggressive T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma No conflicts of interest pertinent to the abstract.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?