Abstract:Background The differentiation and diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia (VT) and pre-excited tachycardia (PXT) remains a challenging task, especially when typical AV dissociation is not present. The purpose of this article is to study the feasibility of a new theoretical algorithm for identifying ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and pre-excited arrhythmias (PA) rhythms (which can be used to distinguish VT from PXT, etc.). Method This study involved the deduction of a new algorithm by combining knowledge of cardiac anatomy, vectorcardiography, and cardiac electrophysiology. The new algorithm evaluated the diagnostic value through intracardiac electrophysiology in 205 cases of VA and PA. The new algorithm diagnoses VA based on the following 4-step process: 1. The QRS complex in leads II, III, and aVF shows a unidirectional R wave, and lead aVR shows a QS pattern. 2. S waves are predominant in two or more of leads I, aVF, and V6. 3. Lead V2 shows ≥3 phase waves or returning branch notching (note: returning branch refers to the band of QRS complexes returning to the baseline). 4. Lead V5 shows a negative wave in the initial portion or returning branch notching. If none of these criteria are met, the diagnosis is PA. The diagnostic value of the new algorithm is compared with the Steurer algorithm and the Vereckei algorithm (diagnosed based on the QRS waveform characteristics of the two algorithms during electrophysiological verification, excluding the diagnosis of atrioventricular dissociation). Results The new algorithm showed significant advantages in terms of AUC value (0.83 vs. 0.61 vs. 0.57), sensitivity (83.6 % vs. 23.3 % vs. 24.8 %), and accuracy (82.9 % vs. 48.3 % vs. 46.3 %) compared to the Steurer algorithm and Vereckei algorithm based on QRS waveform characteristics for diagnosing VA (137 cases) and PA (68 cases). This indicates that the new algorithm is more accurate in identifying idiopathic VA. While there was a significant difference in specificity between the New algorithm and Steurer algorithm (82.3 % vs. 98.5 %, p < 0.05), the difference with Vereckei algorithm (82.3 % vs. 89.7 %) was not significant.In the New algorithm, the sensitivity and specificity for each step are as follows: - Step 1: Sensitivity 34.3 %, Specificity 94.1 %. - Step 2: Sensitivity 24.1 %, Specificity 98.5 %. - Step 3: Sensitivity 18.3 %, Specificity 100 %. - Step 4: Sensitivity 6.6 %, Specificity 89.7 %. Step 1 had the highest AUC value, indicating the best overall diagnostic performance among all steps. Step 2 and Step 3 also performed well, while Step 4 had relatively poorer diagnostic performance. Conclusion The new algorithm is suitable for identifying the origin of VA and PA rhythms.

B-PO02-170 IDENTIFYING THE ORIGIN OF OUTFLOW TRACT VENTRICULAR ARRHYTHMIAS BASED ON PRINTED ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC RECORDS WITH AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ALGORITHM

Comparative analysis of electrocardiographic imaging and ECG in predicting the origin of outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias

Cardiac Arrhythmia Classification Based on 3D Recurrence Plot Analysis and Deep Learning.

Precordial transition and V2 transition ratio for distinguishing left from right ventricular outflow tract arrhythmia origin

Automatic and interpretable prediction of the site of origin in outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias: machine learning integrating electrocardiograms and clinical data

The Use of Artificial Intelligence for Detecting and Predicting Atrial Arrhythmias Post Catheter Ablation

Automatic Coordinate Prediction of the Exit of Ventricular Tachycardia from 12-Lead Electrocardiogram

A High-Precision Deep Learning Algorithm to Localize Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias

A Deep Learning-based Classification Algorithm for the Origin of Premature Ventricular Contractions.

Disentangling Inter-Subject Variations: Automatic Localization Of Ventricular Tachycardia Origin From 12-Lead Electrocardiograms

Investigating Origins of Ventricular Arrhythmia Arising From Right Ventricular Outflow Tract and Comparing Initial Ablation Strategies

Application of deep learning algorithm to locate the origin of outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias based on paper electrocardiogram

Training machine learning models with synthetic data improves the prediction of ventricular origin in outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias

Machine learning for distinguishing right from left premature ventricular contraction origin using surface electrocardiogram features

Localization of Origins of Premature Ventricular Contraction in the Whole Ventricle Based on Machine Learning and Automatic Beat Recognition from 12-Lead ECG.

A New Method for Locating the Ablation Targets of Ventricular Outflow Tract Arrhythmias

Amplitude of QRS complex within initial 40 ms in V2 (V2QRSi40): Novel electrocardiographic criterion for predicting accurate localization of outflow tract ventricular arrhythmia origin

A Four-Stepwise Electrocardiographic Algorithm for Differentiation of Ventricular Arrhythmias Originated from Left Ventricular Outflow Tract.

Retrospective Study of the Electrophysiological Characteristics and Criteria of Ablation Target for Ventricular Arrhythmia Originating from Right Ventricular Outflow Tract

Localizing the Origin of Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmia from ECG Using an Attention-Based Recurrent Convolutional Neural Network

Study on the feasibility of distinguishing ventricular and pre-excited arrhythmia rhythms by a new algorithm