Abstract:In this essay I propose two different but complementary models with which to think about the relation between the novel and the historical process of globalization. The first—the globalization of the novel—works not with particular textual formations, but with the historical expansion of the novel form hand-in-hand with the colonial enterprise of Western Europe. With this interpretative concept, I review the historical and theoretical parameters that have been used to study both the historical spread of the novel from Europe to the peripheries and the constitution, at the end of the nineteenth and throughout the twentieth century, of a global system of production, reception, and translation of novels. The second model—the novelization of the global—focuses on the production of images of a globalized world as they are constructed in specific novels. My examples are novels by Jules Verne and Eduardo Ladislao Holmberg. While both writers create images of travelers spreading modern bourgeois culture throughout the world and beyond, as might be expected, Verne's images differ significantly from Holmberg's. My claim here is that the particular geopolitical determinations that marked each of these writers produced dissimilar imaginaries of the global reach of their bourgeois characters and plots. Finally, in a coda to this double hypothesis, I connect the interpretative models of the globalization of the novel and the novelization of the global with the rentrée of the concept of world literature. Recently re-introduced to academic debate by Franco Moretti, Pascale Casanova, and David Damrosch, among others, this restored notion of world literature can be understood as an attempt to conceptualize the global ubiquity of the novel since the mid-twentieth century. Here I analyze what could be called the cultural politics of world literature and the critical and pedagogical practices that are derived from this concept. I also examine its underlying claim to address, in academic practices, cosmopolitan expectations related to the production of a discourse about the world based on respect for cultural difference. In other words, my question is whether world literature, as a concept and as a practice, is capable of becoming an effective cosmopolitan discourse.

Variation in Literary Exchanges and the Formation of World Literary Canons

The Reconstruction of Literary Canon and the Future of Comparative Literature:An Interview with David Damrosch

“Weltliteratur”: from a utopian imagination to diversified forms of world literatures

The Expansion of the Boundary of Literary Study and the Reconstruction of Canon

World Literature and the Dynamic Function of Translation

Globalizing Chinese literature: toward a rewriting of contemporary Chinese literary culture

World Literature and China

A New Orientation in Chinese-Western Comparative Literature: From Homogeneity to Variation

The Globalization of the Novel and the Novelization of the Global. A Critique of World Literature

On World Literatures, Comparative Literature, And (Comparative) Cultural Studies

A Reflection on the Literary Relationship between China and the West

Women’s Writing in the Atlas of World Literature: a Case Study of J. K. Rowling

Variation in the Translation of Jin Ping Mei

Towards a Socio-Cultural Account of Literary Canon’s Retranslation and Reinterpretation: The Case of The Journey to the West

Comparative Literature and World Literature

Angloglobalism, multilingualism and world literature

The Conception of World Poetics and the Forming of a Global Academic Community

Foreign / World Literature: The Problem of Nominative Definition

Analysis on the Significance of Foreign Literature Translation to Cross-Cultural Communication

The "Going to the World"-oriented Translation of Chinese Literature and Its Cultural Adjustment

Framing, rewriting, and reception in world literature: the case of Wolf Totem