Abstract:In physics, you don't have to go around making trouble for yourself, – nature does it for you. All science is either physics or stamp collecting. Why is the concept of self-organized criticality (SOC), such an interdisciplinary subject, being applied in geophysics, astrophysics, or financial physics with equal fervor? On the most general level, the common denominator of all SOC processes in different science disciplines is the statistics of nonlinear processes, which exhibit omnipresent powerlaw distributions. Nonlinear processes are characterized by a nonlinear growth phase, during which coherent growth is enabled, which has multiplicative characteristics, in contrast to linear processes with incoherent and additive characteristics. Thus, incoherent random processes exhibit binomial, Gaussian, Poissonian, or exponential distribution functions, while coherent processes exhibit powerlaw-like distributions. This is the fundamental trait that earthquakes, solar flares, or stock market crashes have in common, although the underlying physics could not be more different. Therefore, it is important to understand that the powerlaw feature does not require any particular physical model: it can all be explained by mathematical theory in terms of statistical probabilities, as we discussed in Chapters 3 and 4. SOC behavior can thus also be simulated by mathematical rules, as we illustrated in terms of cellular automaton models in Chapter 2. Consequently, our treatment of SOC systems has been entirely physics-free so far, not requiring any particular physical model to understand the observed statistical distributions and correlations. However, there are some free parameters we used in our analytical SOC models (Chapter 3) that can only be explained in terms of a physical model for a particular phenomenon, such as the value α i of the powerlaw slope for each parameter distribution i, or the powerlaw indices β i j between various correlated parameters i and j. At this point, SOC models become specific because the physics of solar flares is different from the physics of tectonic plates. In the following we will focus on specific physical models of astrophysical SOC processes.

Observations and Simulations of Self-Organized Criticality Phenomena in Astrophysics

A Macroscopic Description of a Generalized Self-Organized Criticality System: Astrophysical Applications

Percolation Models of Self-Organized Critical Phenomena

Avalanches of Magnetic Flux Rope in the State of Self-Organized Criticality

Eigen microstates in self-organized criticality

Nonstationary but quasisteady states in Self-organized Criticality

9. Physical Soc Models

Eigenstates in the self-organised criticality

Markov Chain Hidden behind Power Law Mechanism of Self-organized Criticality

Evidence of Enhanced Self-Organized Criticality (SOC) Dynamics During the Radially Non-Local Transient Transport in the HL-2A Tokamak

The State of Self-Organized Criticality of the Sun During the Last Three Solar Cycles. II. Theoretical Model

Universal Constants and Energy Integral in Self-Organized Criticality Systems

Self-organized criticality of turbulence in strongly stratified mixing layers

Homeostatic Criticality in Neuronal Networks

Scaling laws and indications of self-organized criticality in urban systems

Analysis of self-organized criticality in weighted coupled systems

Self-Organization of Complex Systems

Witten-type topological field theory of self-organized criticality for stochastic neural networks

Blackout Model Based on OPF and Its Self-organized Criticality

Universal Quantification for Self-Organized Criticality in Atmospheric Flows

Self-organizing Complex Networks: individual versus global rules