Comparison of effectiveness and safety of GnRH agonist long protocol with GnRH antagonist protocol in Chinese infertile women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

邓可,李玲,王雨宁,邹康,孙鑫
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn101441-20210518-00221
2022-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To systematically compare the effectiveness and safety of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist long protocol and GnRH antagonist protocol in Chinese infertile women, thus providing scientific support for clinical practice.Methods:We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CBM, CNKI and Wanfang Data for eligible randomized controlled trials from inception to June 2019. Two well-trained reviewers who had full understanding of the study protocol conducted the literature screening, risk of bias assessment and data extraction independently. Meta analyses were conducted by RevMan5.3 software.Results:Totally 14 randomized controlled trials were identified for analysis, including 2335 Chinese infertile women patients, with age ranged from 29.0 to 38.9 years and 3.8-6.8 years duration of infertility. Bias risk of included studies was moderate to high. Meta analyses suggested that in Chinese infertile women, compared with GnRH antagonist protocol, application of GnRH agonist long protocol increased the number of retrieved oocytes (MD=0.60, 95% CI=0.07-1.13, P=0.030), but there were no significant differences between the two protocols when referred to M Ⅱ oocyte rate ( RR=1.03, 95% CI=0.99-1.07), fertilization rate ( RR=1.02, 95% CI=0.99-1.05), number of embryos transferred (MD=-0.05, 95% CI=-0.15-0.04), good-quality embryo rate obtained (MD=-0.17, 95% CI=-0.66-0.33), implantation rate ( RR=0.96, 95% CI=0.80-1.15) and clinical pregnancy rate ( RR=1.07, 95% CI=0.93-1.22). As for safety evaluation, there were no significant differences between the two protocols in cancellation rate ( RR=1.74, 95% CI=0.98-3.10) and abortion rate ( RR=1.08, 95% CI=0.68-1.72), while the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rate of GnRH agonist long protocol was significantly higher than that of GnRH antagonist protocol ( RR=2.77, 95% CI=1.59-4.81, P<0.001). Conclusion:Current available evidence showed that in Chinese infertile women, application of GnRH agonist long protocol may result in more retrieved oocytes and higher OHSS risk than GnRH antagonist protocol, while there were no significant differences between the two protocols in M Ⅱ oocyte rate, fertilization rate, number of embryos transferred, good-quality embryo rate, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, cancellation rate and abortion rate.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?