Efficacy and safety of domestic produced recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin in Chinese women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation : a randomized controlled trial

宋颖,李蓉,乔杰,郁琦,靳镭,徐望明,杨冬梓,刘见桥,朱依敏
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn101441-20211118-00508
2022-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of domestic recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin (r-hCG) for injection in Chinese women undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH).Methods:In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, positive, parallel controlled clinical trial, the infertile women with normal ovarian reserve who received COH in seven reproductive medical centers from July 2017 to October 2018 were randomly divided into two groups: experimental group (domestic r-hCG, n=112) and control group (imported r-hCG, n=116). Interactive web response system was used to randomize. The total number of oocytes obtained, cleavage cells, two pronuclei fertilization, mid-division oocytes rate, positive serum hCG rate, early embryo loss rate, clinical pregnancy rate, sustained pregnancy rate and the incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups during the cycle of COH. Results:During the initiation cycle of ovulation induction therapy, the total number of oocytes obtained in experimental group and control group were (12.1±5.6) and (12.0±6.7) respectively, with no statistically significant difference ( P>0.05). There were no significant differences in the rate of mid-division oocytes, the number of cleavage cells, the number of double pronuclear fertilization, the positive rate of serum hCG during the transplantation cycle, the loss rate of early embryo, the clinical pregnancy rate, and the sustained pregnancy rate between the two groups (all P>0.05), and the 90% confidence interval ( CI) of the difference between the two groups fell within the preset equivalence threshold (-3, +3). The difference in immunogenicity assessment between the two groups was not statistically significant ( P>0.05). The incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and other adverse reactions in treatment period were not significantly different between the two groups (all P>0.05), which were known adverse reaction occurred in the imported r-hCG. Conclusion:In the COH cycle of Chinese infertile women with normal ovarian reserve, the effectiveness and safety of domestic r-hCG are equivalent to imported r-hCG.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?