Graphs with Diameter N-E Minimizing the Spectral Radius
Jingfen Lan,Linyuan Lu,Lingsheng Shi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2012.05.038
IF: 1.307
2012-01-01
Linear Algebra and its Applications
Abstract:The spectral radius rho(G) of a graph G is the largest eigenvalue of its adjacency matrix A(G). For a fixed integer e >= 1, let G(n,) (min)(n-e) be a graph with minimal spectral radius among all connected graphs on n vertices with diameter n-e. Let P-n1, n2,....n1, p(m1, m2,....mt) be a tree obtained from a path of p vertices (0 similar to 1 similar to 2 similar to . . . similar to (p - 1)) by linking one pendant path P-ni at m(i) for each i is an element of {1, 2. . . . , t}. Fore = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. G(n, n-e)(min) were determined in the literature. Cioaba et al. [2] conjectured for fixed e >= 6. G(n, n-e)(min) is in the family P-n,P- e = {P-2, 1,....1, 2, n-e+1(2, m2,....me-4, n-e-2) vertical bar 2 < m(2) < . . . < m(e-4) < n - e - 2}. For e = 6, 7, they conjectured G(n, n-6)(min) = P-2, 1, 2, n-5(2, inverted right perpendicularD-1/2inverted left perpendicular, D-2) and G(n, n-7)(min) = P-2,P- 1,P- 1,P- 2,P- n-62,P- left perpendicularD+2/3right perpendicular,P- D- left perpendicularD+2/3right perpendicular,P- D-2. In this paper, we settle their conjectures positively. Note that any tree in P-n,P- e is uniquely determined by its internal path lengths. For any e - 4 non-negative integers k1, k2, . . . , k(e-4), let T-(k1,T- k2,T-....ke-4) = P-2, 1,.... 1, 2, n-e+1(2, m2,....me-4, n-e-2) with k(i) = m(i+1) - m(i) - 1, for 1 <= i <= e - 4. (Here we assume m(1) = 2 and m(e-3) = n - e - 2.) Let s = Sigma(e-4)(i=1) ki + 2/e-4. For any integer e >= 6 and sufficiently large n, we prove that G(n, n-e)(min) must be one of the trees T-(k1,T- k2,T-....ke-4) with the parameters satisfying left perpendicularsright perpendicular - 1 <= k(j) <= left perpendicularsright perpendicular <= k(i) <= inverted rightperpendicularsinverted left perpnedicular + 1 for j = 1, e - 4 and i = 2, . . . , e - 5. Moreover, 0 <= k(i) - k(j) <= 2 for 2 <= i <= e - 5, j = 1, e - 4; and vertical bar k(i) - k(j)vertical bar <= 1 for 2 <= i, j <= e - 5. These results are best possible as shown by cases e = 6, 7, 8, where G(n,n-e)(min) are completely determined here. Moreover, if n - 6 is divisible by e - 4 and n is sufficiently large, then G(n, e)(min) = T-(k-1,T- k,T- k,T-...,T- k,T- k,T- k-1) where k = n-6/e-4 - 2. (c) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.