Prediction of metabolic syndrome with impaired glucose tolerance in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cohort study

李琳,郑程荣,靳志涛,王熙然,秦雪英,鞠鹏,李全民,白玉蓉
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115791-20210602-00304
2021-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To investigate the predictive role of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) on the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in patients with metabolic syndrome (MS).Methods:This study was a retrospective cohort study. A total of 1 989 participants who underwent medical examination in PLA Rocket Force Characteristic Medical Center from June 2012 to September 2019 were enrolled. The participants were equal or more than 40 years old and without previous T2DM. The general information, physical examination data, and laboratory indexes were analyzed, and the occurrence of T2DM was followed up as the research outcome. According to occurrence of T2DM, the subjects were divided into T2DM group and non-T2DM group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to assess the risk of T2DM in people with MS and (or) IGT, and the population attribution score (PAF) was calculated to express the proportion of T2DM attributed to MS and IGT.Results:The average follow-up time of the study was 5.1 years. During the follow-up period, a total of 291 people (14.6%) were diagnosed with T2DM. Compared with those without T2DM, individuals with T2DM were older and had higher waist circumference, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, triglycerides, fasting blood glucose, and oral glucose tolerance test 2-hours plasma glucose ( P<0.01). Participants with a family history of diabetes and a history of smoking were more likely to develop T2DM ( P<0.05). After adjusting for baseline age, gender, smoking, drinking, exercise, and family history of diabetes, participants with MC at baseline had a higher risk of developing T2DM (HR=2.84, 95%CI 1.20-6.69) and PAF (PAF=18.70%, 95%CI 11.82%-25.60%) than participants with non-MC. The risk of T2DM with IGT (HR=3.17, 95%CI 1.88-5.34) and PAF (PAF=21.63%, 95%CI 10.07%-35.53%) were higher than those with non-IGT. Participants with non-MC and IGT (PAF=11.50%, 95%CI 10.71%-19.83%) was more related to the incidence of T2DM than participants with MC and normal glucose tolerance (PAF=0.69%, 95%CI -5.75%-11.47%). Patients with MC who have IGT among the metabolic components have the highest risk of T2DM (HR=4.39, 95%CI 2.40-8.04) and the highest PAF (PAF=21.87%, 95%CI 10.63%-37.34%). Conclusions:In this certain department of physical examination center, individuals with both MC and IGT have the high risk of T2DM.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?