Short-term outcomes of follow-up for pulmonary ground glass nodules: a report of 2 247 cases

奚俊杰,陈振淙,孙奉昊,李明,王群
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112434-2200806-00364
2020-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To analyze the changes and interventions of pulmonary ground glass nodules during follow-up, and to investigate the growth rules of pulmonary ground glass nodules.Methods:A total of 2 247 cases of pulmonary ground glass nodules were included from October 2017 to June 2019. There were 633 males and 1 614 females, with an average age of 49.9 years old. The treatment and changes of nodules were analyzed.Results:Two hundred and sixty-six patients received surgery, and the remaining 1 981 patients were still in follow-up. The average follow-up time for patients who continued to follow-up was (35.5±21.1) months, the median follow-up time was 29(12-165) months, the average follow-up time for surgical patients was (19.5±18.5) months, and the median follow-up time was 13(3-97)months. Of the 266 patients who underwent surgery, 19 were due to the progression of ground glass nodules, 166 ground glass nodules did not change, and 81 patients received surgery in other hospitals without knowing whether the changes occurred. There was no significant difference in postoperative pathology and surgical methods between patients with and without nodular progression. The baseline mean maximum diameter of pure ground glass nodules in the progression group was significantly greater than that in the non-progression group[(1.3±0.5)cm vs. (0.9±0.4)cm, P=0.038]. Conclusion:Ground glass nodules progress slowly, and surgery after progress does not affect the method and effect of the surgery.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?