Innovative Clinical Scenario Simulator for Step-by-Step Microsurgical Training
Lei Cui,Yan Han,Xin Liu,Baoliang Jiao,Honggang Su,Mi Chai,Miao Chen,Jun Shu,Wenwen Pu,Leren He,Yudi Han
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2240-1305
2024-02-13
Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
Abstract:Background Microsurgical training should be implemented with consideration of operative difficulties that occur in actual clinical situations. We evaluated the effectiveness of a novel clinical scenario simulator for step-by-step microsurgical training that progressed from conventional training to escalated training with additional obstacles. Methods A training device was designed according to multiple and intricate clinical microsurgery scenarios. Twenty surgical residents with no experience in microsurgery were randomly assigned to either the control group (conventional training curricula, n = 10) or the experimental group (step-by-step training courses, n = 10). After 4 weeks of laboratory practice, the participants were scheduled to perform their first microvascular anastomoses on patients in an operating room. The Global Rating Scale (GRS) scores and operative duration were used to compare microsurgical skills between the two groups. Results There were no significant differences in the participants' baseline characteristics before microsurgical training between the groups with respect to age, sex, postgraduate year, surgical specialty, or mean GRS score ( p < 0.05). There were also no significant differences in recipient sites between the two groups ( p = 0.735). After training, the GRS scores in both groups were significantly improved ( p = 0.000). However, in the actual microsurgical situations, the GRS scores were significantly higher in the experimental than control group ( p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the operative duration between the two groups ( p < 0.13). Conclusion Compared with a traditional training program, this step-by-step microsurgical curriculum based on our clinical scenario simulator results in significant improvement in acquisition of microsurgical skills. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. The authors sought consent from all individuals to publish their data before manuscript submission. Study conception and design: L.C., Y.D.H., Y.H., H.G.S., L.R.H.; acquisition of data: L.C., Y.D.H., B.L.J., M. Chai, M. Chen, J.S., W.W.P., X.L.; analysis and interpretation of data: L.C., Y.D.H., B.L.J., M. Chai, M. Chen, J.S., W.W.P., X.L.; drafting of manuscript: L.C., Y.D.H., Y.H., L.R.H. All authors critically reviewed the manuscript and approved the final version. Received: 06 July 2023 Accepted: 05 January 2024 Accepted Manuscript online: 08 January 2024 Article published online: 12 February 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
surgery