Accessibility and Rationality of In-home Self-medication among Acute Disease Patients in Gansu Province:a Household Survey

CAO Jin,ZHANG Ming,ZHAO Junxian,ZHAO Shuaixiang,LYU Meng,ZHAO Siya,HU Ming,WANG Xiaohui
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.00.282
2022-01-01
Chinese General Practice
Abstract:BackgroundSelf-medication behavior often occurs in acutely ill patients, which may lead to a greatly increased risk of adverse drug events. There are few surveys on the accessibility and rationality of in-home self-medication among acute disease patients against a background of implementing multiple policies associated with China's healthcare reform initiated in 2009, and the available surveys mainly focus on central and eastern China.ObjectiveTo investigate the accessibility and rationality of in-home self-medication among acute disease patients in Gansu, offering evidence for standardizing in-home medication, and improving accessibility and rationality of in-home self-medication in this group.MethodsBy use of multistage stratified random sampling, 1 080 households were selected from five cities in Gansu Province from June to December 2018. They were invited to attend a survey guided by the WHO Household Survey to Measure Access to and Use of Medicines for understanding the morbidity in household members in the past two weeks, use and accessibility of medicines for treating acute diseases using a questionnaire developed by our research team. The survey results were statistically analyzed. Spearman correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between acute diseases, accessibility and availability of medicines for treating acute diseases and the number of drugs and antibiotics.ResultsOut of the 1 080 households, 1 071 (99.17%) effectively responded to the survey. The prevalence of acute diseases in family members living in these households in the past two weeks was 36.32% (389/1 071) . In this study, we only included the youngest family member with acutely disease in each household, that is, 389 cases in all. Of them, 350 (89.97%) had an acute upper respiratory infection; 355 (91.26%) had the behavior of seeing a doctor or buying drugs; 355 (91.26%) were on medication for treating acute diseases. Among all cases on medication, 279 (78.59%) used combination therapy, 93 (26.20%) had four or more medications simultaneously, and 151 (42.54%) were on antibiotics. Among all antibiotics users, 133 (79.17%) took antibiotics recommended by doctors, and 136 (80.95%) used β- Lactam antibiotics. In terms of medicine accessibility, 334 (85.86%) of acute disease patients were able to reach the nearest medical facility within 15 minutes; 354 (91.00%) and 329 (84.58%) reported that the required drugs were available at the public medical facilities and pharmacy, respectively. Among all cases on medication, 349 (98.31%) had medical insurance, but only 64 (18.34%) were reimbursed; 42 (11.83%) reported that the spending on medicines accounted for over 20% of the total household spending. There were statistically significant differences between patients in urban and rural areas at the avenues of seeing a doctor or buying drugs, types of antibiotics used, 15 minutes proximity to the nearest medical facility, accessibility to drugs at pharmacies, drug reimbursement rates, and spending over 20% of total household expenditure on drugs for acute illnesses (P<0.05) . Spearman correlation analysis showed that accessibility to drugs at the pharmacy was positively correlated with the number of drugs taken (rs=0.145, P<0.05) .ConclusionThe accessibility to drugs among acute diseases patients in Gansu Province is high. However, there are also issues among patients, including high prevalence of combination therapy and antibiotics intake, low proportion of patients who are reimbursed by medical insurance, as well as urban and rural differences in medicine accessibility. Therefore, to regulate residents' self-medication behaviors, it is suggested that relevant government departments give priority to actions to raise residents' awareness levels of rational medication and health insurance, medical professionals' capabilities and supervision of antibiotics use.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?