Abstract:Super-enhancers and stretch enhancers represent classes of transcriptional enhancers that have been shown to control the expression of cell identity genes and carry disease- and trait-associated variants. Specifically, super-enhancers are clusters of enhancers defined based on the binding occupancy of master transcription factors, chromatin regulators, or chromatin marks, while stretch enhancers are large chromatin-defined regulatory regions of at least 3,000 base pairs. Several studies have characterized these regulatory regions in numerous cell types and tissues to decipher their functional importance. However, the differences and similarities between these regulatory regions have not been fully assessed. We integrated genomic, epigenomic, and transcriptomic data from ten human cell types to perform a comparative analysis of super and stretch enhancers with respect to their chromatin profiles, cell type-specificity, and ability to control gene expression. We found that stretch enhancers are more abundant, more distal to transcription start sites, cover twice as much the genome, and are significantly less conserved than super-enhancers. In contrast, super-enhancers are significantly more enriched for active chromatin marks and cohesin complex, and more transcriptionally active than stretch enhancers. Importantly, a vast majority of super-enhancers (85%) overlap with only a small subset of stretch enhancers (13%), which are enriched for cell type-specific biological functions, and control cell identity genes. These results suggest that super-enhancers are transcriptionally more active and cell type-specific than stretch enhancers, and importantly, most of the stretch enhancers that are distinct from super-enhancers do not show an association with cell identity genes, are less active, and more likely to be poised enhancers.

Heterogeneity of Enhancers Embodies Shared and Representative Functional Groups Underlying Developmental and Cell Type-Specific Gene Regulation

Chromatin Potential Identified by Shared Single Cell Profiling of RNA and Chromatin

A giant cell enhancer achieves cell-type specificity through activation via TCP and repression by Dof transcription factors

Enhancer selectivity across cell types delineates three functionally distinct enhancer-promoter regulation patterns

Histone Modifications at Human Enhancers Reflect Global Cell-Type-specific Gene Expression

EnhancerNet: a model for enhancer selection in dense regulatory networks recapitulates the dynamics of cell type acquisition

Characterization of Single-Cell Cis-regulatory Elements Informs Implications for Cell Differentiation.

Synthetic enhancers reveal design principles of cell state specific regulatory elements in hematopoiesis

Enhancer dependence of cell-type–specific gene expression increases with developmental age

Developmental and housekeeping transcriptional programs display distinct modes of enhancer-enhancer cooperativity in Drosophila

Histone H3K27ac separates active from poised enhancers and predicts developmental state

Dynamic Control of Enhancer Repertoires Drives Lineage and Stage-Specific Transcription During Hematopoiesis

Functional Dissection of the Enhancer Repertoire in Human Embryonic Stem Cells

Mapping the evolving landscape of super-enhancers during cell differentiation

Cell-type and dynamic state govern genetic regulation of gene expression in heterogeneous differentiating cultures

Enhancer-dependence of Gene Expression Increases with Developmental Age

Differential cofactor dependencies define distinct types of human enhancers

Enhancers and super-enhancers have an equivalent regulatory role in embryonic stem cells through regulation of single or multiple genes

Super-enhancers Are Transcriptionally More Active and Cell Type-Specific Than Stretch Enhancers

Cell type- and transcription-independent spatial proximity between enhancers and promoters

Enhancer–core-promoter specificity separates developmental and housekeeping gene regulation