Bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis identifies causal associations between cardiovascular diseases and frozen shoulder

WeiSong Lu,Bin Pu,Sen Wang,MengZe Li,Yue An,Jie Lian,YongQuan Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-04600-7

IF: 2.6

2024-02-05

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

Abstract:Although prior observational studies indicate an association between cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and frozen shoulder (FS), the potential causal relationship between them remains uncertain. This study aims to explore the genetic causal relationship between CVDs and FS using Mendelian randomization (MR).

orthopedics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore the potential causal relationship between cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and frozen shoulder (FS). Specifically, the study aims to reveal whether cardiovascular diseases can lead to frozen shoulder and whether frozen shoulder can increase the risk of cardiovascular diseases through two - way, two - sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis.

### Research Background
Although previous observational studies have shown an association between cardiovascular diseases and frozen shoulder, the causal relationship behind this association has not been clear. Observational studies are difficult to establish causal relationships because they cannot control interventions, confounding factors, and biases. Therefore, researchers adopted the Mendelian randomization method, using genetic variation as an instrumental variable to reduce the influence of confounding factors and reverse causality.

### Research Objectives
1. **Explore the causal impact of cardiovascular diseases on frozen shoulder**: Through Mendelian randomization analysis, evaluate whether multiple cardiovascular diseases (such as atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, heart failure, myocardial infarction, stroke, and ischemic stroke) can lead to frozen shoulder.
2. **Explore the reverse causal impact of frozen shoulder on cardiovascular diseases**: Through reverse Mendelian randomization analysis, evaluate whether frozen shoulder can affect the risk of occurrence of cardiovascular diseases.

### Research Methods
- **Data Sources**: Obtain genetic variation data related to frozen shoulder from the FinnGen Consortium, and obtain relevant data of cardiovascular diseases from multiple large - scale genome - wide association studies (GWAS).
- **Analysis Methods**: Use inverse - variance weighted (IVW), MR - Egger, and weighted median methods for Mendelian randomization analysis to ensure the robustness of the results.
- **Sensitivity Analysis**: Verify the reliability of the results through multiple sensitivity analyses, including Cochran’s Q test, MR - PRESSO method, MR - Egger intercept method, and leave - one - out analysis.

### Main Findings
1. **Forward Causal Analysis**: The results show that the genetically determined risks of stroke and ischemic stroke are significantly associated with frozen shoulder (OR [95% CI] = 1.58 [1.23–2.03], P < 0.01; OR [95% CI] = 1.46 [1.16–1.85], P < 0.01). There is no obvious causal relationship between other cardiovascular diseases (such as atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, heart failure, and myocardial infarction) and frozen shoulder.
2. **Reverse Causal Analysis**: No significant causal impact of frozen shoulder on cardiovascular diseases was found.

### Conclusions
The research results show that stroke can increase the risk of frozen shoulder, but frozen shoulder does not significantly increase the risk of cardiovascular diseases. This finding provides a theoretical basis for clinical practice, but further basic and clinical studies are still needed to verify these results.

### Formula Representation
All formulas involved in the article are accurately presented in Markdown format:

- **F - statistic calculation formula**:
\[
F=\frac{(N - 2)\times R^{2}}{1 - R^{2}}
\]
where \(R^{2}\) represents the degree to which SNPs explain the exposure variable, and \(N\) represents the sample size.

- **R² calculation formula**:
\[
R^{2}=2\times MAF\times(1 - MAF)\times\beta^{2}
\]
where \(MAF\) represents the minor allele frequency, and \(\beta\) represents the exposure effect size.

- **R² calculation formula when MAF is lacking**:
\[
R^{2}=\frac{\beta^{2}}{\beta^{2}+SE^{2}\times N}
\]

These formulas ensure the validity and reliability of genetic variation as an instrumental variable.