Abstract:Abstract In the chiral unitary approach, we have studied the single Cabibbo-suppressed decays $$\Lambda _c\rightarrow pK^+K^-$$ Λ c → p K + K - and $$\Lambda _c \rightarrow p \pi ^+\pi ^-$$ Λ c → p π + π - by taking into account the s -wave meson–meson interaction as well as the contributions from the intermediate vectors $$\phi $$ φ and $$\rho ^0$$ ρ 0 . Our theoretical results for the ratios of the branching fractions of $$\Lambda _c\rightarrow p {\bar{K}}^{*0}$$ Λ c → p K ̄ ∗ 0 and $$\Lambda _c\rightarrow p \omega $$ Λ c → p ω with respect to the one of $$\Lambda _c\rightarrow p \phi $$ Λ c → p φ are in agreement with the experimental data. Within the picture that the scalar resonances $$f_0(500)$$ f 0 ( 500 ) , $$f_0(980)$$ f 0 ( 980 ) , and $$a_0(980)$$ a 0 ( 980 ) are dynamically generated from the pseudoscalar-pseudoscalar interactions in s -wave, we have calculated the $$K^+K^-$$ K + K - and $$\pi ^+\pi ^-$$ π + π - invariant mass distributions respectively for the decays $$\Lambda _c\rightarrow pK^+K^-$$ Λ c → p K + K - and $$\Lambda _c\rightarrow p\pi ^+\pi ^-$$ Λ c → p π + π - . One can find a broad bump structure for the $$f_0(500)$$ f 0 ( 500 ) and a narrow peak for the $$f_0(980)$$ f 0 ( 980 ) in the $$\pi ^+\pi ^-$$ π + π - invariant mass distribution of the decay $$\Lambda _c\rightarrow p\pi ^+\pi ^-$$ Λ c → p π + π - . For the $$K^+K^-$$ K + K - invariant mass distribution, in addition to the narrow peak for the $$\phi $$ φ meson, there is an enhancement structure near the $$K^+K^-$$ K + K - threshold mainly due to the contribution from the $$f_0(980)$$ f 0 ( 980 ) . Both the $$\pi ^+\pi ^-$$ π + π - and $$K^+K^-$$ K + K - invariant mass distributions are compatible with the BESIII measurement. We encourage our experimental colleagues to measure these two decays, which would be helpful to understand the nature of the $$f_0(500)$$ f 0 ( 500 ) , $$f_0(980)$$ f 0 ( 980 ) , and $$a_0(980)$$ a 0 ( 980 ) .

Roles of a(0)(980), ?(1670), andS(1385) in the ?(+ )(c)? ??p(+ )decay

Roles of , , and in the decay

Roles of $f_{0}(500)$ and $f_{0}(980)$ in the $D_{(s)}^{+}\rightarrowπ^{+}π^{+}π^{-}$ decays

The scalar <i>f</i><sub>0</sub>(500), <i>f</i><sub>0</sub>(980), and <i>a</i><sub>0</sub>(980) resonances and vector mesons in the single Cabibbo-suppressed decays <sub>c</sub> <i>pK</i><SUP>+</SUP><i>K</i><SUP>-</SUP> and <i>p</i><SUP>+</SUP><SUP>-</SUP>

Roles of the and in the process

The scalar $$f_0(500)$$, $$f_0(980)$$, and $$a_0(980)$$ resonances and vector mesons in the single Cabibbo-suppressed decays $$\Lambda _c \rightarrow p K^+K^-$$ and $$p\pi ^+\pi ^-$$

The roles of the $T_{c\bar{s}0}(2900)^0$ and $D_0^*(2300)$ in the process $B^-\to D_s^+K^-π^-$

The a0(980) and f0(980) in the process D s + → K + K − π +

$X_0(2900)$ and $χ_{c0}(3930)$ in process $B^+\to D^+ D^- K^+$

The newly observed state $$D_{s0}(2590)^{+}$$

A_1(1420) Resonance As a Tetraquark State and Its Isospin Partner

Are the or resonances in the decay?

Are the $a_{0}(1710)$ or $a_{0}(1817)$ resonances in the $D_{s}^{+} \rightarrow K_{S}^{0}K^{+}π^{0}$ decay?

Roles of the scalar $f_0(500)$ and $f_0(980)$ in the process $D^0\to π^0π^0 \bar{K}^0$

Assignment of charmed-strange $D_{s0}(2590)^+$ and $D_{sJ}(3040)^+$

The $Λ_c^+\toηπ^+Λ$ reaction and the $Λa_0^+(980)$ and $π^+Λ(1670)$ contributions

Role of $f_0(980)$ and $a_0(980)$ in the $B^- \to π^- K^+ K^- $ and $B^- \to π^- K^0 \bar K^0 $ reactions

A Note On Xi(C)(3055)(+) And Xi(C)(3123)(+)

Study of D-0 -> Pi(-)E(+)Ve, D+ -> Pi(0)E(+)Ve, D-0 -> K(-)E(+)Ve, and D+ -> (K)over-Bar(0)e(+)ve in Tagged Decays of the Psi(3770) Resonance

Role of D ( s ) * and their contributions in B ( s ) → D ( s ) h h ′ decays

Resolving the Puzzling Decay Patterns of Chargedzcandzbstates