Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Local Palliative Therapeutics for Unresectable Malignant Biliary Obstruction: a Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

Shaoming Song,Shiyi Gong,Ting Lei,Hongwei Tian,Tingting Lu,Caining Lei,Haojie Jin,Wenwen Yang,Kehu Yang,Tiankang Guo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17474124.2022.2085090
2022-01-01
Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Abstract:Background Both radiofrequency ablation (RFA), photodynamic therapy (PDT), and biliary stent alone are common local palliative therapies for unresectable malignant biliary obstruction (MBO), but the best modality is uncertain. Research design and methods Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science were systematically searched up to 30 January 2022, for eligible studies that compared either two or all modalities in unresectable MBO. Results Thirty-three studies with 2974 patients were included in this study. The PDT+Stent and RFA+Stent groups had better overall survival and longer mean survival time than Stent alone (all P < 0.05). Moreover, patients with RFA+Stent demonstrated better mean duration of stent patency (MD: 2.0, 95%CI,1.1 to 2.8, P < 0.05) than Stent alone. The three modalities had similar postoperative mild bleeding, cholangitis, and pancreatitis (all P >= 0.05). According to network ranking, PDT+Stent was most likely to provide better survival, RFA+Stent was most likely to maintain stent patency. Conclusions RFA or PDT plus biliary stent is effective and safe local palliative therapy for unresectable MBO, but the current studies cannot absolutely determine which modality is the best. We should offer patients the most appropriate treatment according to the advantage of each therapy and the patient's performance status.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?