Where is the missing felsic crust of Greater Indian continent?

Lifei Zhang,Yang Wang,Zhong-Hai Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-227521/v1
2021-01-01
Abstract:Abstract According to the plate tectonics theory, continental crust (CC), especially the felsic upper and middle continental crust (UCC and MCC), cannot subduct due to its buoyancy. Therefore, most, if not all, of the felsic crustal mass will be preserved in continental collision zones or eroded by the surface process. Consequently, the continent-continent convergence is generally slower and more short-lived than oceanic plate subduction. However, the long-duration, fast convergence, and imbalance of crustal mass in the India-Asia collisional system challenge the classical rules of plate tectonics. Systematic compilation and calculations indicate ~20-47% of the felsic crust in Greater India is missing during collision. Based on the phase equilibria modeling and density calculations, we explore the pressure-temperature-dependent density evolutions of UCC and MCC and demonstrate they are denser than the surrounding mantle at P >7-8 GPa when the phase transition from coesite to stishovite occurs. The phase equilibria induced density evolution is further integrated into the thermo-mechanical model, which confirm the deep subduction of Greater Indian continent with its felsic UCC and MCC. Analytical studies of the slab-pull forces in the subduction zone indicate the Greater Indian continent can subduct spontaneously under its own negative buoyancy when it is dragged to a depth of ~170 km by the preceding oceanic slab. The great slab-pull force, induced by the negative buoyancy of UCC and MCC below 170 km, not only contributes to the long-lasting fast convergence between India and Asia, but also explains the crustal mass imbalance during the Himalayan orogeny.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?