Abstract:What is the origin of macroscopic randomness (uncertainty)? This is one of the most fundamental open questions for human beings. In this paper, 10 000 samples of reliable (convergent), multiple-scale (from 10-60 to 102) numerical simulations of a chaotic three-body system indicate that, without any external disturbance, the microscopic inherent uncertainty (in the level of 10-60) due to physical fluctuation of initial positions of the three-body system enlarges exponentially into macroscopic randomness (at the level O(1)) until t = T*, the so-called physical limit time of prediction, but propagates algebraically thereafter when accurate prediction of orbit is impossible. Note that these 10 000 samples use micro-level, inherent physical fluctuations of initial position, which have nothing to do with human beings. Especially, the differences of these 10 000 fluctuations are mathematically so small (in the level of 10-60) that they are physically the same since a distance shorter than a Planck length does not make physical sense according to the string theory. This indicates that the macroscopic randomness of the chaotic three-body system is self-excited, say, without any external force or disturbances, from the inherent micro-level uncertainty. It provides us the new concept "self-excited macroscopic randomness (uncertainty)". The macroscopic randomness is found to be dependent upon microscopic uncertainty, from the statistical viewpoint. In addition, it is found that, without any external disturbance, the chaotic three-body system might randomly disrupt with symmetry-breaking at t = 1000 in about 25% probability, which provides us new concepts "self-excited random disruption", "self-excited random escape" and "self-excited symmetry breaking" of the chaotic three-body system. Hence, it suggests that a chaotic three-body system might randomly evolve by itself, without any external forces or disturbance. Thus, the world is essentially uncertain, since such kind of self-excited macroscopic randomness (uncertainty) is inherent and unavailable. This work also implies that an universe could randomly evolve by itself into complicated structures, without any external forces. To emphasize this point, the so-called "molecule-effect" (or "nonbutterfly effect") of chaos is suggested in this paper. All of these reliable computations could deepen our understandings of chaos from physical viewpoints, and reveal a kind of origin of macroscopic randomness/uncertainty.

Can machine learning really solve the three-body problem?

Three-body Problem - from Newton to Supercomputer Plus Machine Learning

An Intelligent Model with Chaos and Causality

Predicting Chaotic System Behavior using Machine Learning Techniques

Machine Learning for predicting chaotic systems

Machine-learning prediction for mean motion resonance behaviour – The planar case

Active learning meets fractal decision boundaries: a cautionary tale from the Sitnikov three-body problem

Physical limit of prediction for chaotic motion of three-body problem

A statistical solution to the chaotic, non-hierarchical three-body problem

Machine learning method for the supplement, correction, and prediction of the nonlinear dynamics in pattern formation

Machine learning approach for mapping the stable orbits around planets

On the inherent self-excited macroscopic randomness of chaotic three-body system

On the Stability of the Three Classes of Newtonian Three-Body Planar Periodic Orbits

Controlling nonlinear dynamical systems into arbitrary states using machine learning

Machine learning meets the CHSH scenario

Influence of database noises to machine learning for spatiotemporal chaos

Rediscovering orbital mechanics with machine learning

Machine Learning Phase Space Quantum Dynamics Approaches

Modeling Chaotic Systems: Dynamical Equations Vs Machine Learning Approach

Machine learning in physics and geometry

On the Inherent Self-Excited Macroscopic Randomness of Chaotic Three-Body Systems