Dynamic centrifuge modeling to investigate the deformation mechanism of an embedded cantilever retaining wall with submerged backfill conditions
Anurag Sahare,Kyohei Ueda
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.108510
IF: 4
2024-02-07
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Abstract:During previous medium intensity earthquakes, several cantilevered retaining structures shoring waterfront areas experienced large deformations or even collapsed. This was in contrary to the caisson type quay walls which performed better even during the very strong 1995 Kobe earthquake. Within this realm, recent studies have highlighted that saturated backfill adjacent to retaining structures may not fully liquefy and has a strong potential for shear-induced dilation mechanics owing to the presence of substantial static shear. However, despite these negative excess pore pressures and absence of a full liquefaction state in the backfill, cantilevered retaining walls may still experience large deformations. In this paper, a deformation mechanism is proposed for an embedded cantilever retaining wall supporting a submerged backfill made of Ottawa F-65 sand using a geotechnical centrifuge experiment. The dynamic response of the soil–structure system was measured, and the intra-cyclic mechanics were investigated. The entire earthquake duration of 20 s was divided into three different phases. In phase I (comprising of initial 6 s), the retaining wall experienced "sliding" deformations owing to its inertia with negligible soil straining at the backfill. Under the application of subsequent seismic pulses in phase II, large suction drops in excess pore pressures were observed during the translation of the retaining wall toward the backfill, which caused the negative excess pore pressure to exceed the hydrostatic value. However, the temporary release of the suction drops during the deformation of the wall toward the seaside resulted in significant softening as soil crosses the phase-transformation line. This ultimately resulted in significant plasticization of the backfill, and the wall initiated a "rotation" type deformation mechanism with a pivot point located near its base. Intra-cyclic observations revealed an increase in the magnitude of the phase transition in excess pore pressures, which contributed to the increased accumulated soil straining along the backfill. Owing to this, the wall experienced increasing rotations with the application of subsequent cycles in phase II (until 14 s) until the passive resistance in front of the wall was fully mobilized. However, a sudden catastrophic collapse of the wall could be avoided owing to the re-dilation mechanism, during which the soil again underwent a phase transformation and generated negative excess pore pressures on the completion of the wall translation toward the seaside. With the reduction in the amplitude of the applied cycles toward the end of shaking (phase III), the effective stress path in front of the wall moved away from the origin, and the mobilized passive stress reduced, which eventually resulted in the retaining wall achieving a stable state with no additional deformations. The proposed deformation mechanism highlights that a state of full liquefaction is not a necessary prerequisite for an embedded cantilever retaining wall to experience significant deformations, and an understanding of suction mechanics during excess pore pressure generation is critical.
geosciences, multidisciplinary,engineering, geological