Clinical efficacy of esophageal negative pressure drainage in improving congenital esophageal atresia

林阳文,张旻中,邬文杰,施佳,龚一鸣,俞炬明,王俊

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn421158-20201213-00743

2022-01-01

Abstract:Objective:To explore the clinical efficacy of indwelling esophageal negative pressure drainage tube and continuous negative pressure drainage on postoperative anastomotic leakage and anastomotic stricture during esophageal reconstruction.Methods:From January 2013 to December 2019, the relevant clinical data were collected from 130 children with congenital esophageal atresia (CEA). There were 84 boys and 46 girls. Children with esophageal drainage tube placement and postoperative continuous negative pressure drainage were selected as group A (n=81) while those without esophageal tubing as group B (n=49) . In group A, there were 51 boys and 30 girls with a birth age of (37. 6±2. 0) weeks and a birth weight of (2 737±482) grams. And 42. 0% (34/81) were malformed. In group B, there were 33 boys and 16 girls with a birth age of (37.8±2.2) weeks and a birth weight of (2 826±628) grams. And 32. 7% (16/49) were malformed. Demographic profiles, surgical approaches & techniques, ventilator use, complications and diagnosis & treatment were compared between two groups.Results:Thoracoscopy (71. 5%, 93/130) and thoracotomy (28. 5%, 37/130) were performed. Discharges occurred after achieving feeding and postoperative follow-up period ranged from 10 to 60 months. The postoperative incidence of anastomotic leakage was lower in group A than that in group B [18. 5% (15/81) vs 34. 7% (17/49) ]and the difference had statistical significance ( P=0. 038) . There were more children with type Ⅰ & Ⅱ CEA in group A than in group B [45. 7% (37/81) vs 26. 5% (13/49) ]and the difference was statistically significant ( P=0. 030) . The intraoperative proximal and distal esophageal distance was greater in group A than that in group B[ (3. 3±1. 7) vs (2. 7±1. 2) cm]and the difference had statistical significance ( P=0. 039) . After operation, ventilator time was slightly longer in group A than that in group B [ (8. 8±9. 2) vs (6. 1± 7. 9) days]and the difference had no statistical significance ( P=0. 090) ; hospital stay was shorter in group A than that in group B [ (48. 7±38. 0) vs (68. 6±52. 9) days]and the difference had statistical significance ( P=0. 015) ; the incidence rate of anastomotic stricture was higher than that in group B [65. 4% (53/81) vs 49. 0% (24/49) ]and the difference had no statistical significance ( P=0. 064) ; the difference in the number of esophageal dilatation required for anastomotic stricture had no statistical significance [ (10. 3±7. 8) vs (8. 3±7. 1) sessions, P=0. 313]. Conclusions:Indwelling esophageal drainage tube and continuous negative pressure drainage during esophageal reconstruction can effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative anastomotic leakage, improve postoperative recovery and shorten length of hospitalization stay in children.