Abstract:With the increasingly obvious restriction of the ecological environment on economic development, environmental regulations are widely used to achieve “green production,” that is, to improve green total factor productivity (GTFP). First, through the econometric model, it can be concluded that command-based environmental regulations could improve GTFP, while market-based environmental regulations have no significant impact on GTFP. Unlike traditional econometric models, machine learning has no specific data requirements and research assumptions. We use Lasso regression to verify the above results by obtaining the optimal tuning parameter. Furthermore, considering that the leap of China’s economy is inseparable from foreign direct investment (FDI), we use FDI as a threshold variable. The threshold model results showe that when the intensity of FDI in China ranges between 1.2492 and 1.588, both types of environmental regulations can significantly promote GTFP. These conclusions passed the robustness test. Given the differences in economy and resource endowment among different regions in China, a regional heterogeneity test is conducted. The results show that the current environmental regulations in eastern and central China have no significant impact on GTFP. However, when the intensity of FDI in central China is greater than 3.6868, environmental regulations have a significant promoting effect on GTFP. In western China, when FDI intensity ranges between 1.3950 and 1.5880, market-based environmental regulations can significantly promote GTFP. Further, the path test of the mediation effect model reveals that command-based environmental regulations reduce GTFP by reducing FDI. The above conclusions provide empirical data for the intensity of FDI in different regions of China to improve GTFP.

Environmental Regulation, Compliance Strategies, and Productivity: Evidence from China

The Misallocation Cost of Inefficient Environmental Regulation: Evidence from China

Land Use Regulation, Land Reclamation, and Industrial Productivity: Evidence from China

Environmental regulation, firms’ bargaining power, and firms’ total factor productivity: evidence from China

Effects of environmental regulation on firm entry and exit and China’s industrial productivity: a new perspective on the Porter Hypothesis

Environmental regulation, emissions and productivity: Evidence from Chinese COD-emitting manufacturers

Environmental Regulation and Firm Productivity in China

Market-based environmental regulation and total factor productivity: Evidence from Chinese enterprises

Does Stricter Command-and-Control Environmental Regulation Promote Total Factor Productivity? Evidence from China’s Industrial Enterprises

Does Environmental Regulation Improve an Enterprise’s Productivity?—Evidence from China’s Carbon Reduction Policy

DOES STRICTER ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION PROMOTE PRODUCTIVITY? EVIDENCE FROM THE RISING OF POLLUTION DISCHARGE FEE IN CHINA

The effect of stringent environmental regulation on firms’ TFP—new evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in Chongqing’s daily penalty policy

How Does Environmental Regulation Affect Productivity? the Role of Corporate Compliance Strategies

Does Environmental Regulation Affect Labor Demand in China? Evidence from the Textile Printing and Dyeing Industry

Environmental regulation, total factor productivity, and enterprise duration: Evidence from China

Environmental Regulation and Firm Exports: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China

Does environmental regulation affect the export competitiveness of Chinese firms?

Watering Down Environmental Regulation in China*

Environmental Regulation,Environmental Protection Investment and Productivity:An Empirical Study Based on Questionnaire of Enterprises in China

How Environmental Regulations Affect Green Total Factor Productivity—Evidence from Chinese Cities

Exposing the Effects of Environmental Regulations on China’s Green Total Factor Productivity: Results From Econometrics Analysis and Machine Learning Methods