Abstract:The superposition principle of quantum mechanics states that any linear combination of two state vectors |0〉 and |1〉 represents an equally valid physical state of the quantum system: |ψ〉 = a|0〉+ b|1〉. For nonzero coefficients a and b, the state |ψ〉 will not be orthogonal to either |0〉 or |1〉, and |ψ〉 is traditionally said to be a coherent superposition of |0〉 and |1〉. Identifying coherence in this sense involves first stipulating a distinguished basis, {|0〉, |1〉, |2〉, · · · }, which is singled out by the unavoidable interaction with the environment, also known as decoherence [1]. An application of the superposition principle to many-body systems leads to quantum entanglement [2], a nonclassical type of correlation and an important resource for quantum technology. Recent results show that not all quantum technological tasks require the presence of entanglement, but can make use of other nonclassical features such as quantum discord [3] and even quantum coherence [4]. Motivated by this latter discovery, researchers have recently begun developing a resource theory of quantum coherence (see [4] for a review). This resource theory aims to rigorously quantify the amount of coherence in different quantum states and quantum processes, while further studying the use of coherence in quantum technologies, including quantum metrology, quantum computation, quantum random number generation, and quantum communication. From this resource-theoretic perspective, quantum coherence is characterized as some fungible property of quantum states that can be manipulated and exchanged from one system to the next. This issue contributes to various aspects of the resource theory of coherence. Fundamental properties of coherence quantifiers are studied for single particles (Rastegin 2018 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 51 414011, Liu et al 2018 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 51 414012, Rana and Lewenstein 2018 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 51 414002, Liu et al 2018 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 51 414018 and Johnston et al 2018 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 51 414010) and multipartite settings (Kraft and Piani 2018 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 51 414013, Xi 2018 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 51 414016, Takahashi and Chitambar 2018 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 51 414003 and Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical

Coherence-breaking Superchannels

Quantifying Dynamical Coherence with Coherence Measures

Strategies as a potential resource for conversion of POVM-based coherence into entanglement

Partial Coherence and Quantum Correlation with Fidelity and Affinity Distances

The resource theory of coherence for quantum channels

Coherence of quantum Gaussian channels

Coherence requirements for quantum communication from hybrid circuit dynamics

Quantum coherence between subspaces: State transformation, Cohering Power, $k$-coherence and other properties

Entanglement-breaking of quantum dynamical channels

Interrelation Between Partial Coherence and Quantum Correlations

Quantum Coherence and State Conversion: Theory and Experiment

Operational Interpretation of Coherence in Quantum Key Distribution

Experimental Communication Through Superposition of Quantum Channels

Qubit magic-breaking channels

Quantum Coherence Via Conditional Entropy

Experimental verification of a coherence factorization law for quantum states

Experimental Cyclic Interconversion between Coherence and Quantum Correlations.

O ct 2 01 8 Operational interpretation of coherence in quantum key distribution

Quantum Coherence Via Skew Information and Its Polygamy

Preface: Quantum Coherence

Coherence manipulation with dephasing-covariant operations