An Examination of Configural Effects of Employees' Proactive Behavior: A Process Perspective
Liyuan Li,Xiangyu Gao,Xiaoming Zheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1041.2023.00792
2023-01-01
Acta Psychologica Sinica
Abstract:In recent years, scholars have gradually realized that proactive behavior is a self-regulatory process including not only overt behavioral element（i.e., enacting） but also covert behavioral elements（i.e., envisioning,planning, and reflecting）. However, previous research on proactive behaviors focused only on the influence of overt behavioral element on a variety of individual and organizational outcomes but neglected the influence of covert behavioral elements and the synergistic effect of all elements in a proactive process. It leads to an incomplete understanding of proactive behavior. To address this problem, we draw on a process perspective and a configural approach to investigate: 1) the configural effects of all behavioral elements（i.e., envisioning,planning, enacting, and reflecting） in a proactive process on employees’ job performance and emotional exhaustion; 2) the impact of task context（i.e., environmental uncertainty） and social context（i.e., felt trust） on the configural effects of all behavioral elements; and 3) incremental effect of configuration membership on employees’ outcomes after controlling for the unique effects of each element and individual difference（i.e.,proactive personality and neuroticism）.By using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis（fsQCA） and regression analysis, we conducted a longitudinal study to test our hypotheses and examine research questions. We examined the configural effects of all four elements on employees’ job performance and emotional exhaustion, and then examined the impacts of task and social context and the incremental effect of these configurations. 426 full-time employees and their direct supervisors from an education and training company in China participated in a questionnaire survey and reported data at two time points two weeks apart. Supervisors reported their subordinates’ job performance at time 2. The final sample size was 383.The findings reveal that: 1) a configuration with high level of enacting alone is not sufficient for generating high job performance; 2) a configuration with low（high） levels on all four elements is sufficient for producing low（high） job performance regardless of the level of environmental uncertainty; 3) when environmental uncertainty is high, a configuration with high level of envisioning, planning, and reflecting is sufficient for producing high job performance regardless of the level of enacting; 4) a configuration with high level of enacting and low level of envisioning, planning, and reflecting is sufficient for generating high emotional exhaustion; 5) when felt trust is high, a configuration with high level of envisioning, planning, and reflecting is sufficient for producing low emotional exhaustion regardless of the level of enacting; 6) in general, after controlling for the unique effects of each element and individual difference, the configuration membership can still predict employees’ job performance and emotional exhaustion whereas elements in a proactive process cannot.Our research contributes to the literature on proactive behavior. First, our research presents a novel perspective on the process of proactive behavior. The process perspective of proactive behavior provides a fresh window onto why the consequences of proactive behaviors vary between employees and studies. Second, our research advances the understanding of proactive behavior by revealing the configural effects of four elements in a proactive process on employees’ outcomes. Third, our research demonstrates the usefulness of a configural approach in studying process-related issues in proactive behavior research.