Abstract:Accurate specification of spatiotemporal errors of remotely sensed soil moisture (SM) data is essential for a correct assessment of their utility and optimally integrating multiple SM products or assimilating them into hydrological models. Although Triple Collocation Analysis (TCA) has been widely used to provide SM errors, the impact of rescaling technique on the TCA error estimates has not received major attention, which can lead to biased and inaccurate error estimates. Moreover, current knowledge about time-variant SM errors derived from TCA is still very limited, which hampers the advance of applying time-variant errors in data merging and data assimilation studies efficiently. Based on these considerations, this work aims to advance the use of the TCA for characterizing errors with a focus on the rescaling techniques, and validating TCA-based time-variant errors using global ground measurements in 759 grid cells. To this end, the Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT) and four passive-based SM products, including Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity Level-3 (SMOS-L3), SMOS INRA-CESBIO (SMOS-IC), Soil Moisture Active Passive Level-3 (SMAP-L3), and SMAP INRAE BORDEAUX (SMAP-IB) SM products, were considered. The time-variant error term here denotes an aggregate error magnitude over a 101-day moving-time-window. It is found that different selection of the rescaling technique considered in TCA led to TCA error estimates with significantly different accuracy when ground-based errors are regarded as the benchmark. The optimal combination strategy to implement TCA is applying TCA to SM anomalies and rescaling the errors by coefficients derived from the TCA model. Pearson's correlation with ground-based time-variant errors is 0.62, 0.72, 0.83, 0.89, and 0.93 for SMAP-IB, SMAP-L3, SMOS-IC, SMOS-L3, and ASCAT SM, respectively. Considering time-variant errors in applications is necessary since time-variant errors deviate from time-invariant errors by 50% when errors are rescaled by the TCA model parameters. Time-invariant errors are greater than time-variant errors when SM products are rescaled against a reference dataset while the opposite conclusion can be drawn when errors are rescaled by the TCA coefficients. TCA- and ground-based methods provide consistent evaluations in 74.7% (77.3%), 75.8% (79.8%), 79.6% (81.1%), and 78.6% (79.7%) of the analysis period on average (median) for the TCA implementations with SMAP-L3, SMAP-IB, SMOS-L3, and SMOS-IC SM, respectively. The error analysis reveals that TCA typically underestimated ASCAT errors while overestimated passive SM errors when considering ground-based evaluation as the benchmark. Moreover, TCA was found to have relatively less power to efficiently characterize SM errors in croplands when compared with other land cover types. This study validated TCA time-variant errors using ground measurements and compared TCA- and ground-based evaluation performances on a global scale. Our work arouses particular attention to the rescaling technique selection considered in TCA, which is crucial for accurately characterizing SM errors and efficiently using them in various hydrometeorological applications.

Comparison of Traditional Method and Triple Collocation Analysis for Evaluation of Multiple Gridded Precipitation Products across Germany

Cross-evaluation of Ground-Based, Multi-Satellite and Reanalysis Precipitation Products: Applicability of the Triple Collocation Method Across Mainland China

Evaluation and Hydrological Application of Precipitation Estimates Derived from PERSIANN‐CDR, TRMM 3B42V7, and NCEP‐CFSR over Humid Regions in China

The potential and uncertainty of triple collocation in assessing satellite precipitation products in Central Asia

Triple collocation-based error estimation and data fusion of global gridded precipitation products over the Yangtze River basin

Cross-Examination of Similarity, Difference and Deficiency of Gauge, Radar and Satellite Precipitation Measuring Uncertainties for Extreme Events Using Conventional Metrics and Multiplicative Triple Collocation

Comparison of Level 3 Mean Monthly GPROF Products from GPM and TRMM Microwave Imager in Estimating Seasonal Precipitation

Precipitation Merging Based on the Triple Collocation Method Across Mainland China

Cross-validation methods for multi-source precipitation datasets over the sparse-gauge region: applicability and uncertainty

Discovering Optimal Triplets for Assessing the Uncertainties of Satellite-Derived Evapotranspiration Products

Assessing the accuracy and drought utility of long-term satellite-based precipitation estimation products using the triple collocation approach

Evaluation of eight high spatial resolution gridded precipitation products in Adige Basin (Italy) at multiple temporal and spatial scales.

A global-scale intercomparison of Triple Collocation Analysis- and ground-based soil moisture time-variant errors derived from different rescaling techniques

Multiscale Comparative Evaluation of the GPM and TRMM Precipitation Products Against Ground Precipitation Observations Over Chinese Tibetan Plateau

Evaluation and Comparison of 11 Sets of Gridded Precipitation Products over the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau

Evaluation of Six Satellite and Reanalysis Precipitation Products Using Gauge Observations over the Yellow River Basin, China

Evaluating Root-Zone Soil Moisture Products from GLEAM, GLDAS, and ERA5 Based on In Situ Observations and Triple Collocation Method over the Tibetan Plateau

Evaluation of multisatellite precipitation products by use of ground‐based data over China

Evaluation of GSMaP Version 8 Precipitation Products on an Hourly Timescale over Mainland China

Cross-Evaluation of Soil Moisture Based on the Triple Collocation Method and a Preliminary Application of Quality Control for Station Observations in China

Evaluation of Three Satellite Precipitation Products TRMM 3B42, CMORPH, and PERSIANN over a Subtropical Watershed in China