IDDF2021-ABS-0206 A New Computer-Assisted Diagnosis Scoring System Based on Deep Learning for Predicting Inflammatory Activity from Patients with Ulcerative Colitis

Hongzhi Xu,Yanyun Fan,Ruochen Mu,Yinghao Zhang,Chenxi Xie,Lupeng Liu,Lin Wang,Jianlin Ren,Liansheng Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2021-iddf.174
IF: 24.5
2021-01-01
Gut
Abstract:Background Endoscopy is increasingly important for the evaluation of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). However, there were considerable differences in endoscopic assessment because of the endoscopists’ training experience, not only that, existing endoscopy scoring methods cannot reflect the inflammation’s details of the full-length endoscopic video; therefore, we sought to develop an automatic scoring system using deep learning technology for consistent and objective of endoscopic images and videos from patients with UC. Methods ResNet50 pre-trained on ImageNet was selected as our CNN main framework. We collected 5,875 endoscopic images and 16 full-length videos from patients with UC who underwent colonoscopy from January 2017 through March 2021as the dataset. The scoring system was trained by these images and could predict the Mayo score and UCEIS score by the feature it has learned on the training set. In addition, by using the predicted outcome, the CAD could show a ribbon in the shape of the colon which can reflect the conditions of the inflammation (location, severity). The scoring system is composed of clarity cleaning, similarity judgement and score prediction networks. This corresponding relation which combines the exiting endoscopy scores prediction, helps the system to output a new score with weighted calculation, as well as the lesions’ location and severity ratio. Results Two clinical reviewed our consistency statistics. The primary evaluation metric we used is quadratic weighted kappa (QWK). The trained CNN got high levels with 90.2% accuracy in the Mayo-scored task, while the QWK coefficient was 0.906 (95%CI, 0.880-0.933). The metrics of UCEIS-scored task were inspiring of which accuracy were 90.7%, 84.6%, 77.7%, QWK coefficient were 0.887 (95%CI, 0.860-0.915), 0.876 (95%CI, 0.844-0.907), 0.816 (95%CI, 0.739-0.892) for vascular pattern, erosions-and- ulcers and bleeding. Meanwhile, the CNN identified 16 full-length endoscopy videos and evaluated 1,360 local information from 100 intestine segments. The results of these localized intestinal tissue marked by the scored system were distributed in four ranges, and the quantities were 772(0.0-0.4), 124(0.72-2.35), 206(3.2-4.0), 258(5.2-8.4). It performed desirable compared with the clinical diagnosis. Conclusions The results of objective evaluations of UC based on this scoring system appeared acceptable. Compared with the previous scored methods (only refer to the most severe lesion and ignored other mild parts), this work is of clinical significance and will help clinicians by supplying a good capacity in identifying endoscopy data and stimulating the colon’s inflammatory environment.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?