Lithospheric gravitational potential energy and its contribution to tectonic stress field in the Tibetan Plateau and its surrounding regions

Li ZhongYa,Hu MinZhang,Wang Yong,Wang Jian,Shen ChongYang,Li Hui
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6038/cjg2022P0622
2022-01-01
Abstract:The uneven lateral distribution of lithospheric mass profoundly affects the tectonic stress styles and tectonic deformation of the Tibetan Plateau and its surrounding areas. According to the definition of gravitational potential energy (GPE) , the initial model of GPE in the Tibetan Plateau and its surroundings is calculated using Crust 1.0 model data set. Then we constrain the mantle density data by the two kinds of isostasy adjustment models which are Airy isostasy and Pratt isostasy respectively. Through the above steps, three reasonable lithospheric GPE models which are uncompensated, compensated by Airy isostasy and Pratt isostasy in the Tibetan Plateau and its surrounding areas are established. Comparing with uncompensated GPE model, both isostasy compensation models change little of GPE values. The distribution characteristics of GPE from three models are very close, which show that the distribution of GPE is positively correlated with surface topography. There is a high GPE area within the plateau, whereas the GPE around the plateau is relatively low. The variation ranges of GPE of the three models are respectively 1420. 24 similar to 1579. 99 MPa, 1413. 22 similar to 533. 80 MPa and 1415. 00 similar to 1552. 15 MPa. The deviatoric stress field arising from GPE differences in the plateau and its surroundings is solved by the finite element method. The results show that areas with high GPE are in deviatoric tension and those with low GPE are compressional deviatoric stresses. Magnitudes of deviatoric stress associated with GPE differences are in the range of 10 similar to 30 MPa. We compare deviatoric stresses arising from GPE differences with GNSS strain rates. And results show, in areas with large lateral variations of GPE, such as Qaidam basin and south-central Sichuan-Yunnan block which are within the plateau, and northwestern Tarim block, western Ordos block, northwestern South China block and northern Indian plate which are around the plateau, the deviatoric stress field inferred from GPE differences and GNSS strain field are highly correlated because they have same style of tension and compression and directions of main axis from them agree well. These results suggest the driving force of plate motion affects its tectonic deformation in the form of GPE in the northern and eastern marginal regions of the Tibetan Plateau far away from the Eurasian plate boundary, while in the Himalayas, GPE difference acts in the opposite direction to the Indian plate subduction.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?