Optimized Grade Group for Reporting Prostate Cancer Grade in Both Systematic and MRI-targeted Biopsies

G. Song,Y. He
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.24365
2022-01-01
The Prostate
Abstract:Purpose To explore an optimized grade group (oGG) criterion from systematic biopsies (SB) and targeted biopsies (TB) and offer a better prediction of radical prostatectomy (RP) grade group (GG). Methods Positive needles were collected from 146 patients who underwent SB + TB followed by RP. The grade was assigned for two different kinds of biopsies with five GG criteria: (1) global GG (gGG); (2) most common GG (most common GG from SB + TB, mGG); (3) highest GG (highest numerical GG from SB + TB, hGG); (4) largest volume/linear length cancer GG (defined as GG from the SB + TB with the largest length of cancer in a needle, lGG). These biopsy grades were compared (equivalence, upgrade, or downgrade) with the final grade of the RP lesion, using weighted kappa coefficients; (5) Then the best agreement of the (2) (3) (4) grading scores from SB or TB was combined to introduce an oGG. Results In this study, gGG showed generally poor agreement (47.2%) with RP GG (weighted kappa: 0.43). Using the three criteria (mGG, hGG, and lGG) of SB, mGG had the best agreement (55.5%, weighted kappa: 0.46), while hGG and lGG had a lower agreement (48.6% and 48.6%, weighted kappa: 0.42 and 0.38). Using the three criteria (mGG, hGG and lGG) of TB: lGG had the best agreement (56.8%, weighted kappa: 0.43), while mGG and hGG had lower agreement (50.0% and 49.3%, weighted kappa: 0.40 and 0.40); Then oGG was generated (higher GG between mGG of SB and lGG of TB) and the agreement of oGG increased to 59.6% and weighted kappa was 0.49. Additionally, oGG had a lower upgrade rate than gGG, while the downgrade rate remained unchanged. Conclusions oGG showed better agreement with RP GG than gGG. oGG had a lower upgrade rate than gGG, while downgrade rate remained unchanged.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?