1O Furmonertinib Versus Gefitinib in Treatment-Naïve EGFR Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multi-Center, Phase III Study (FURLONG)

Y-K. Shi,G. Chen,X. Wang,Y. Liu,L. Wu,Y. Hao,C. Liu,S. Zhu,X. Zhang,Y. Li,J. Liu,L. Cao,Y. Cheng,H. Zhao,S. Zhang,A. Zang,J. Cui,J. Feng,F. Liu,C. Gu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2022.02.010
IF: 51.769
2022-01-01
Annals of Oncology
Abstract:Furmonertinib (AST2818) is an irreversible, selective third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of furmonertinib versus gefitinib in untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR sensitizing mutations. FURLONG was a randomized, double-blind, phase III study conducted in 55 centers across mainland China. Stage IIIB/IIIC/IV NSCLC patients with EGFR Ex19Del or L858R mutation positive were enrolled to receive either furmonertinib 80 mg/d or gefitinib 250 mg/d as first-line therapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by an independent review center (IRC). Between May 30, 2019 and Dec 5, 2019, 358 patients were randomized to receive furmonertinib (n=178) or gefitinib (n=180) treatment. In the furmonertinib and gefitinib groups, 35% and 32% had central nervous system (CNS) metastases at baseline, respectively. As of Sep 15 2021, the median follow-up was both 21.0 months in each group. The median PFS with furmonertinib was significantly longer than with gefitinib (20.8 versus 11.1 months; HR 0.44 [95%CI 0.34-0.58]; p<0.0001). The clinical benefit of PFS was consistent across all pre-specified subgroups including patients with CNS metastases (HR 0.50 [95%CI 0.32-0.80]). The median duration of exposure was 18.3 months in the furmonertinib group and 11.2 months in the gefitinib group, whereas the frequency of grade≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) was 11% in the furmonertinib group and 18% in the gefitinib group. Furmonertinib significantly prolonged PFS and showed less grade≥3 TRAEs compared with gefitinib as first-line treatment in advanced EGFR mutated NSCLC patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?