Abstract:William F Lamb1,2,∗, Thomas Wiedmann, Julia Pongratz, Robbie Andrew, Monica Crippa, Jos G J Olivier, Dominik Wiedenhofer, Giulio Mattioli, Alaa Al Khourdajie, Jo House, Shonali Pachauri, Maria Figueroa, Yamina Saheb, Raphael Slade, Klaus Hubacek, Laixiang Sun, Suzana Kahn Ribeiro, Smail Khennas, Stephane de la Rue du Can, Lazarus Chapungu, Steven J Davis, Igor Bashmakov, Hancheng Dai, Shobhakar Dhakal, Xianchun Tan, Yong Geng, Baihe Gu and Jan Minx 1 Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change, Torgauer Straße 12–15, 4 EUREF Campus #19, 10829 Berlin, Germany 2 School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT Leeds, United Kingdom 3 Sustainability Assessment Program, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia 4 Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Bundesstrasse 53, 20146 Hamburg, Germany 5 Department of Geography, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, Luisenstrasse 37, 80333 Munich, Germany 6 CICERO Center for International Climate Research, Oslo, Norway 7 European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, VA, Italy 8 PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Den Haag, The Netherlands 9 Institute of Social Ecology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Schottenfeldgasse 29, 1070 Vienna, Austria 10 Department of Transport Planning, TU Dortmund University, August-Schmidt-Straße 10, 44227 Dortmund, Germany 11 Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom 12 School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, University Road, BS8 1SS Bristol, United Kingdom 13 International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Schlossplatz 1, 2361 Laxenburg, Austria 14 Department of Management Society and Communication, Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen, Denmark 15 Openexp, 17 Bd Lefebvre, 75015 Paris, France 16 Integrated Research for Energy, Environment and Society, University of Groningen, 9747AG Groningen, The Netherlands 17 Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, United States of America 18 School of Finance and Management, SOAS University of London, WC1H 0XG London, United Kingdom 19 Institute of Blue andGreenDevelopment,Weihai Institute of Interdisciplinary Research, ShandongUniversity,Weihai 264209, People’s Republic of China 20 Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro—UFRJ), Transport Engineering Programme (Programa de Engenharia de Transportes—PET), COPPE-UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 21 Energy and Climate Change Consultant, 25 Troubridge Walk, CV22 7LP Rugby, United Kingdom 22 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States of America 23 Great Zimbabwe University, School of Natural Sciences, Off Old Great Zimbabwe Road, Box 1235, Masvingo, Zimbabwe 24 Department of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, United States of America 25 Center for Energy Efficiency—XXI, Moscow, Russia 26 College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China 27 Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Change, School of Environment, Resources and Development, Asian Institute of Technology, Klong Luang, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand 28 Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 15, Zhongguancun Beiyitiao, Haidian District, Beijing, People’s Republic of China 29 School of International and Public Affairs, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 1954 Huashan Road, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China ∗ Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed.

Correction to “Updated Global Black Carbon Emissions from 1960 to 2017: Improvements, Trends, and Drivers”

China’s Air Pollution Control Calls for Sustainable Strategy for the Use of Coal

Correction to Characteristics of Particulate Carbon Emissions from Real-World Chinese Coal Combustion

Updated Global Black Carbon Emissions from 1960 to 2017: Improvements, Trends, and Drivers

Evaluating and Addressing the Leakage Problems of Black Carbon Mitigation in China’s Domestic Sector

Corrigendum to "High-resolution mapping of vehicle emissions in China in 2008" published in Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 9787–9805, 2014

Carbon Dioxide Capture and Utilization-Closing the Carbon Cycle

Trend in Global Black Carbon Emissions from 1960 to 2007

New Discoveries to Old Problems: A Virtual Issue on Air Pollution in Rapidly Industrializing Countries.

Author Correction: Near-real-time monitoring of global CO2 emissions reveals the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic (Nature Communications, (2020), 11, 1, (5172), 10.1038/s41467-020-18922-7)

Achieving National Emission Reduction Target-China'S New Challenge and Opportunity

Corrigendum: A review of trends and drivers of greenhouse gas emissions by sector from 1990 to 2018 (2021 Environ. Res. Lett. 16 073005)

Response to Comment on “surface Urban Heat Island Across 419 Global Big Cities”

Black Carbon Emissions in China from 1949 to 2050

Exposure to Ambient Black Carbon Derived from a Unique Inventory and High-Resolution Model

Spatial and Temporal Variation of Anthropogenic Black Carbon Emissions in China for the Period 1980–2009

Data Science for Advancing Environmental Science, Engineering, and Technology.

Increasingly Important Role of Russian Emissions in Modulating the Arctic Climate System.

Sources and Trends of Black Carbon Aerosol in a Megacity of Nanjing, East China after the China Clean Action Plan and Three-Year Action Plan

Mitigating black carbon emissions: key drivers in residential usage and coke/brick production

Origin and Radiative Forcing of Black Carbon Aerosol: Production and Consumption Perspectives.