<i>Kiss1</i>-dependent and independent release of luteinizing hormone and testosterone in perinatal male rats

Jing Chen,Shiori Minabe,Arisa Munetomo,Fumie Magata,Marimo Sato,Sho Nakamura,Masumi Hirabayashi,Yasuhiro Ishihara,Takeshi Yamazaki,Yoshihisa Uenoyama,Hiroko Tsukamura,Fuko Matsuda
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1507/endocrj.EJ21-0620
2022-01-01
Endocrine Journal
Abstract:Prenatal and postnatal biphasic increases in plasma testosterone levels derived from perinatal testes are considered critical for defeminizing/masculinizing the brain mechanism that regulates sexual behavior in male rats. Hypothalamic kisspeptin neurons are indispensable for stimulating GnRH and downstream gonadotropin, as well as the consequent testicular testosterone production/release in adult male rats. However, it is unclear whether kisspeptin is responsible for the increase in plasma testosterone levels in perinatal male rats. The present study aimed to investigate the role of Kiss1/kisspeptin in generating perinatal plasma LH and the consequent testosterone increase in male rats by comparing the plasma testosterone and LH profiles of wild-type (Kiss1(+/+)) and Kiss1 knockout (Kiss1(-/-)) male rats. A biphasic pattern of plasma testosterone levels, with peaks in the prenatal and postnatal periods, was found in both Kiss1(+/+) and Kiss1(-/-) male rats. Postnatal plasma testosterone and LH levels were significantly lower in Kiss1(-/-) male rats than in Kiss1(+/+) male rats, whereas the levels in the prenatal embryonic period were comparable between the genotypes. Exogenous kisspeptin challenge significantly increased plasma testosterone and LH levels and the number of c-Fos-immunoreactive GnRH neurons in neonatal Kiss1(-/-) and Kiss1(+/+) male rats. Kiss1 and Gpr54 (kisspeptin receptor gene) were found in the testes of neonatal rats, but kisspeptin treatment failed to stimulate testosterone release in the cultured testes of both genotypes. These findings suggest that postnatal, but not prenatal, testosterone increase in male rats is mainly induced by central kisspeptin-dependent stimulation of GnRH and consequent LH release.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?