Abstract:Journal of Endovascular Therapy, Ahead of Print. Objective:The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of drug-coated balloon (DCB) and drug-eluting stents (DESs) to standard endovascular techniques like percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and bare metal stent (BMS) for treating infrapopliteal artery disease.Methods:Including 8 DCB trials and 4 DES trials, this meta-analysis of 12 recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is comprehensive. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science of Web, Cochrane, and PubMed for this meta-analysis. We searched these databases for papers from their inception to February 2023. We also analyzed the references given in the listed studies and any future study that cited them. No language or publication date restrictions were applied to the 12 RCTs. The experimental group includes 8 DCB studies and 4 DES investigations, the DCB group is primarily concerned with the paclitaxel devices, whereas the DES group is preoccupied with the "-limus" devices. Key clinical outcomes in this study were primary patency and binary restenosis rates. This study's secondary outcomes are late lumen loss (LLL), clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), limb amputation, and all-cause mortality. The evidence quality was assessed using Cochrane risk-of-bias. The PROSPERO registration number for this study is CRD42023462038.Findings:Only 108 of 1152 publications found satisfied qualifying criteria and contained data. All 13 RCTs have low to moderate bias. Drug-coated balloons and DESs were compared in the excluded study. The analysis comprised 2055 participants from 12 RCTs that met the inclusion criteria, including 1417 DCB patients and 638 DES patients. Drug-coated balloons outperform traditional methods in short-term monitoring of primary patency, binary restenosis, and CD-TLR. The benefits fade over time, and the 2 techniques had similar major amputation rates, mortality rates, and LLL. Drug-eluting stents outperform conventional procedures in primary patency, binary restenosis, and CD-TLR during medium-term to short-term follow-up. Comparing the 2 methods, major and minor amputations, death rate, and LLL were similar.Conclusion:Comparison of DES and DCB with PTA or BMS shows that DES had better follow-up results. DCB has positive short-term results, but long-term effects differ, however, more research is needed to determine when DES and DCB should be used in medical procedures.Clinical ImpactThe provision of additional evidence to substantiate the advancement of drug-coated balloon (DCB) therapy in the treatment of lower limb arteriosclerosis obliterans, particularly in the below-the-knee area characterized by high calcium load and significant occlusion, is comparable in efficacy to conventional procedures. This finding is advantageous for the progress of interventional revascularization. The advancement and efficacy of DCB have resulted in improved treatment outcomes for medical practitioners in clinical settings. Our research incorporates the most recent randomized experiments.

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Outcomes of Drug-Eluting Stent Versus Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Diseases.

Drug-eluting Balloons Versus Drug-Eluting Stents for the Management of In-Stent Restenosis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Observational Studies

DRUG-ELUTING STENTING VERSUS CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT FOR UNPROTECTED LEFT MAIN CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE: A META-ANALYSIS BASED ON TIME-TO-EVENT DATA FROM RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIALS

Comparison of Drug-eluting Stent Versus Drug-coated Balloon for Peripheral Artery Diseases of Lower Limbs Using Meta-analysis

Peripheral Artery Disease Intervention: Drug-Coated Balloon vs Drug-Eluting Stent, A Long-Term Comparison

Different drugs in drug-eluting stents for peripheral artery disease: a systematic evaluation and Bayesian meta-analysis

Comparison of Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty vs. Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis in the Routine Clinical Practice: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Two-year results and subgroup analyses of the PEPCAD China in-stent restenosis trial: A prospective, multicenter, randomized trial for the treatment of drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis.

Association of Survival With Femoropopliteal Artery Revascularization With Drug-Coated Devices

The Efficacy of Drug-Coated Balloons and Drug-Eluting Stents in Infrapopliteal Revascularization: A Meta-analysis

Drug-Eluting Stent Versus Drug-Coated Balloon Revascularization in Patients With Femoropopliteal Arterial Disease

Long-Term Effects of Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bare Metal Stents on Patients with Acute St-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Outcomes of 3-Year Clinical Follow-Up

Comparison of Drug-Eluting Stent with Bare-Metal Stent Implantation in Femoropopliteal Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Comparation of drug-eluting stents and control therapy for the treatment of infrapopliteal artery disease: a Bayesian analysis.

Survival After Coronary Revascularization With Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Drug-Coated balloons vs drug-eluting stents for the treatment of small coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of randomized trials

One-year Outcomes of Drug-Eluting Stent Versus Drug-Coated Balloon for Femoropopliteal Artery Lesions: BEASTARS Study Results

Drug-coated Balloon Versus Drug-Eluting Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction

Treatment of Patients With De Novo Small-Vessel Coronary Lesions: Analysis of Six Randomised Controlled Trials Comparing Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons With Drug-Eluting Stents

Long-term clinical outcomes of successful revascularization with drug-eluting stents for chronic total occlusions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Clinical Outcomes of Drug-Eluting versus Bare-Metal In-Stent Restenosis after the Treatment of Drug-Eluting Stent or Drug-Eluting Balloon: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.