EESD special issue: AI and data-driven methods in earthquake engineering - (Part 2) FOREWORD
Xinzheng Lu,Henry Burton
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3974
IF: 4.06
2023-01-01
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Abstract:Artificial intelligence (AI) has become increasingly important in earthquake engineering research, as it offers new possibilities for understanding, predicting, and mitigating the effects of earthquakes and related hazards. In the coming years, there will be continued research in AI-informed earthquake engineering that is focusing on ground motion modeling, geotechnical engineering, structural analysis, seismic design, health monitoring, multi-hazard assessment, and other areas, to enhance the safety and resilience of buildings and infrastructure. This is Part 2 of the special issue, whose topics include geotechnical engineering, structural analysis, design, health monitoring, damage evaluation, and seismic risk assessment. The first three articles in the Part 2 issue examine the application of AI and data-driven methods to geotechnical earthquake engineering. Hudson, Ulmer, Zimmaro, Kramer, Stewart, and Brandenberg propose an automated method for discretizing soil layers in cone penetration test (CPT) profiles using unsupervised machine learning (ML). The method aims to overcome the limitations of manual approaches that heavily rely on the analyst's experience and subjective judgment, which may lead to unrealistic results. Automated layer detection is achieved using a combination of agglomerative clustering and two cost functions to identify the optimal number of layers. The proposed algorithm is tested using 272 CPT profiles from the next generation liquefaction (NGL) database and is currently being used to develop liquefaction triggering and manifestation models. The results indicate that the proposed method has the potential to eliminate the bias induced by engineers. In spite of this, the authors recommend that the results from the automated detection be visually reviewed to ensure their validity. The paper by Hu, Xiong, Zhang, and Wang develops an approach to enhance the prediction accuracy of Bayesian network (BN) models used to evaluate earthquake-induced liquefaction settlement. The study deals with a specific limitation in existing BN models that require discretization of continuous variables, which limits predictions to categorical outcomes or ranges of settlement values. The authors address this challenge by proposing a hybrid approach that integrates domain knowledge with the hill-climbing algorithm in the formulation of a continuous BN regression model. The required conditional probability distributions of the parameters that define the BN model are computed based on historical liquefaction-induced settlement data and a Gaussian process learner. Using five-fold cross-validation, the authors show that the continuous BN model provides better generalization performance compared to previous approaches including those that employ the discrete BN classification strategy, simplified estimators such as the Tokimatsu–Seed and Ishihara–Yoshimine methods as well as an artificial neural network (ANN) model. Zhang, Ayello, Honegger, Bozorgnia, and Taciroglu develop an ML -based approach to predict the seismic response of fault-crossing natural gas pipelines, with the aim of improving the efficiency of time-consuming simulations. The study used the results from 217K nonlinear finite element analyses (FEA) for training and testing. Regression models based on ANNs are used as surrogate models for prediction. The input features cover various combinations of soil, structure, and fault attributes, and the output variable is the pipeline response under fault rupture displacement. The results from a case study indicated that the ANN method performs well, with the coefficient of determination R2 > 0.95. Based on the trained model and 14.5 million Monte Carlo-generated inputs, a large number of response predictions are obtained, forming a dataset that supplemented the missing input-output points in the 217K FEAs and improved the prediction accuracy. The following four articles aim to apply AI and data-driven methods to the advancement of structural seismic design and evaluation. Note that five more articles were published in Part 1 regarding the application to seismic design and analysis. Issa, Silva-Lopez, Baker, and Burton formulate an ML based optimization framework to support resilience-based design. More pointedly, an ML-driven surrogate model is used to capture the highly nonlinear relationship between the set of input variables used in the design and the building recovery performance. The surrogate model uses 43 design-related features as inputs and generates recovery time predictions, enabling (i) rapid estimation of recovery performance under a range of user-defined improvements, and (ii) implementation of complex and informative optimization techniques. The results from an application to a 3-story steel moment resisting frame office building showed that the surrogate model had a high prediction accuracy with the coefficient of determination R2 > 0.99, and reduced the computation time from 300 to 0.0002 s, further supporting the evaluation of the relationship between nonstructural and structural improvement strategies on recovery-based design. Liao, Wang, Fei, Huang, Xie, and Lu developed a physics-rule-co-guided self-supervised generative adversarial network (GAN) for determining the layout and mechanical properties of seismic isolation bearings. The self-supervised GAN addresses the limited availability of isolation design information that is needed to develop data-driven models. Four models comprise the intelligent design model including a physics estimator, rule evaluator, discriminator, and design generator. A deep neural network (DNN)-based surrogate model that predicts the response of the isolator is at the core of the physics estimator. A tensor operation-based loss calculator serves as the rule evaluator by ensuring that the design parameters are specified in accordance with the governing code or standard. The physics estimator and rule evaluator work together to guide the learning process of a GAN model without requiring ground truth data. A series of case studies were conducted using varying seismic intensities and building geometries. The results showed that the GAN design was consistent with the engineers’ design and was approximately 60 times more efficient than traditional engineering methods. A critical aspect of the design and performance assessment of base-isolated structures is ensuring that the axial pressure and shear deformation of the rubber bearings are within reasonable limits. Unlike pressure studies which consider the two loading mechanisms individually, the paper by Zeng, He, and Pan considers the coupling effect of axial pressure and shear deformation. Specifically, the authors develop a DNN to simultaneously detect the axial pressure and shear deformation in the rubber bearing of base isolators. Named pressure and deformation neural network (P&D-Net), the proposed model integrates wavelet packet decomposition with a fully connected neural network. The data set used to train the P&D-Net was derived from a series of full-scale physical tests performed on smart rubber bearings. By implementing a series of data-driven experiments, the study showed that the ability to accurately detect the axial pressure in the bearing is strongly influenced by the shear deformation and vice versa, thus highlighting the importance of considering the interaction between the two mechanisms. Furthermore, compared to a prior method which only used wave-let packets, the P&D-Net significantly improved the predictive performance. Guan and Burton formulate a computationally efficient method for performing collapse fragility assessment of building structures using the collaborative filtering (CF) technique. The CF-based collapse performance assessment procedure reduces the number of explicit simulations when conducting incremental dynamic analyses. The method randomly selects and runs a subset of the required nonlinear response history analyses (NRHAs) and uses CF to estimate the structural performance of the omitted cases. The results estimated by the CF are combined with that of the explicit NRHAs to obtain the corresponding fragility curves. The proposed method is applied to three archetype steel moment frame structures, and the results showed that the CF-based approach could reduce the required NTRAs by up to 50% while providing reliable collapse fragility estimates. Further, a series of sensitivity analyses showed that the method is robust to variations in key input parameters and the record-set used in the analyses. The following three articles apply AI and data-driven methods to advancing monitoring technologies for evaluating the behavior and performance of building structures. Note that four more articles on this sub-topic were published in Part 1. Eltouny and Liang present an uncertainty-aware early warning system that is specifically designed to avoid deep learning model mistakes and can provide near real-time structural health monitoring (SHM). The system utilizes a deep composite encoder-decoder network that combines elements from convolutional neural networks, recurrent neural networks, and variational inference to provide damage index distributions. The framework can detect anomalies in the structural system during seismic events and provide a measure of uncertainty that can be used to question the model's predictions. They apply their proposal to three real structures, two of which suffered damage during the 1994 Northridge earthquake. The framework is able to send a warning whenever damage is present. The results of the case study show that the number of warning signals sent correlates well with actual damage. In a comparative study, the proposed method is superior to two recently developed variational autoencoder (VAE)-based damage detection methods. Long-term SHM systems for large structures are known to suffer from data loss which reduces the reliability of near-real-time performance assessments. The paper by Zheng, Li, Li and Hao [Correction added on 2nd of August 2023, replaced author from Chou, Liu and Chang to Zheng, Li, Li and Hao.] implements a transformer-based GAN to reconstruct response measurements that are lost in SHM systems. Within the GAN, a multi-level wavelet-based discriminator is used to determine the degree of realism in the spectra of the reconstructed signals that are produced by the generator. The response reconstruction model was evaluated on two bridges at very different scales (pedestrian bridge and long-span vehicular traffic bridge), both equipped with SHM systems. The performance of the model was evaluated by establishing a relationship between the number of lost SHM channels and the response reconstruction error. For the pedestrian bridge, the error in the reconstructed response was limited to less than 25% even when five of the six channels were lost. When applied to the vehicular traffic bridge, the GAN limited the response reconstruction error to less than 30% despite losing half of the 16 channels that comprised the SHM system. Wang, Xu, Jing, Cui, Zhang, and Li formulated a deep learning model to automatically classify post-earthquake building damage from optical remote sensing images. Recognizing that several prior studies have developed image-based earthquake-induced building damage assessment models, the authors introduce a unique loss function that combines geometric consistency constraints (GCCs) with cross-entropy (CE). The GCC-CE-based loss function enhances the segmentation capability of the image classification model for buildings with complex geometries while providing superior overall performance at multiple scales. The GCC loss was designed to measure split line lengths, curvature, and area which facilitated more precise extraction of the complex geometries in damaged buildings. Compared to image-based damage detection models developed only using CE loss, the GCC-CE model reduced the duration of the training process which provided more accurate predictions. In terms of prediction accuracy, the GCC-CE-based loss model achieved the highest mean intersection over the union (mIoU) (86.98%). The specific improvements in segmentation capabilities include more reliable recognition of edge closures, removal of internal, and reduction of both false-positive and false-negative predictions. The last five articles apply AI and data-driven methods to seismic risk assessment at the regional scale and post-earthquake damage assessment of building structures. Kang, Kim, Kwon, and Song propose two frameworks for regional seismic loss assessment based on DNNs to extend the applicability of engineering demand parameter (EDP) residual estimation and improve its accuracy. The first framework estimates the EDP residuals of buildings by combining the EDP residuals of various single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) systems through modal combination rules. Three DNN models are constructed to predict the EDP residuals of SDOF systems. The second framework predicts the EDP residuals of buildings directly using the two DNN models. The accuracy of the two DNN-based frameworks is tested by comparing the results to those obtained from explicit response history analysis and the regression-based models. The numerical example demonstrated the importance of considering EDP residual correlation and the successful performance of the proposed frameworks in regional seismic loss assessment. Li, Farrar, and Yang develop a deep generative learning framework that achieves efficient regional seismic risk assessment. The method constructs input–output surrogate models of regional seismic risk by learning the underlying complex relation between earthquake source parameters and site-specific infrastructure performance at many locations from data. The learned deep surrogate models directly output the ground motion intensity map and the risk map of a region given the earthquake source parameters, circumventing the massive amounts of computation and data access that would be needed for site-specific assessments. They validate the presented framework on the bridge network risk assessment using simulated scenario earthquakes in the San Francisco Bay Area. They observe that the deep surrogate models perform well without the need for data access to locations and structures and are time-efficient (approximately 0.015 s). Galvis, Hulsey, Baker, and Deierlein presented a methodology to identify and evaluate relevant damage indicators that can be quantitatively related to safety thresholds using numerical simulations of damage. Ideally, these indicators should be insensitive to variability in the structural materials and model parameters. As such, the damage indicators are selected based on their reliability in estimating structural safety and the sensitivity to modeling uncertainty. The safety threshold for each damage indicator is selected to maximize accuracy in post-earthquake building assessments. The methodology is demonstrated through an application study of ductile reinforced concrete frame buildings. Results show that aggregated indices of structural component damage (e.g., aggregated over the floor of a building) have a level of accuracy of approximately 80% and outperform other damage indicators based on peak or residual drifts or simpler percentages of damaged components. It is noted that the methodology can be applied to a wider variety of structures to improve post-earthquake evaluation guidelines. Ahmed, Mangalathu, and Jeon proposed a stacked long short-term memory network to consider the influence of ground motion and structural characteristics on post-earthquake building damage assessment. Unlike previous studies, acceleration history and the number of stories are utilized to generalize the results for the same plan building frames with different numbers of stories. Three different approaches are presented in this work to link the ground motion history with the number of stories (2, 4, 8, 12, and 20 stories) in a reinforced concrete building frame, and the networks were tested using unseen ground motions. Of the three tested approaches, those providing good results were selected for further analysis. For the approaches chosen, the network architectures were changed to a diamond shape and an autoencoder-like shape with more hidden units (to obtain higher accuracy), which were tested on frames with unseen plan layouts. The adopted approaches produced high predictive accuracy (80%−90%) and low training time. The proposed model shows superior performance relative to previously developed techniques. Bhatta and Dang perform ML-based seismic damage prediction of RC buildings, while considering both seismic and structural parameters. The paper first evaluates the feasibility of using ML techniques such as K-nearest neighbor, random forest, decision tree, support vector machine, and ANN to rapidly predict earthquake-induced reinforced concrete building damage considering both the structural properties and ground motion characteristics. Then, the ML models are trained using the simulation results. Due to a lack of real earthquake damage datasets, most prior related studies utilized simulation data to develop ML-based earthquake damage prediction models. In contrast, this study uses real earthquake damage data for RC buildings collected after the 2015 Nepal Earthquake. An overall accuracy of more than 62% is obtained for the test set. The study demonstrates that ML algorithms are capable of rapidly predicting the seismic damage of reinforced concrete buildings with reasonable accuracy. Based on the 28 articles published in Part 1 and Part 2 of the special issue and a review of the broader literature, we present the following brief outlook on how AI can be further integrated into earthquake engineering research and practice: It is expected that there will be an increased focus on developing hybrid models that combine physics-based simulations with AI-based approaches to improve the accuracy of ground motion prediction models while reducing computational costs. AI-based methods will also continue to improve our understanding of geotechnical earthquake engineering such as soil-structure interaction and liquefaction potential. AI-infused structural analysis and performance assessment models will be trained on increasingly larger and more generalizable datasets and used to predict structural response, damage, and collapse, and develop optimal retrofit schemes and smart materials. AI has the potential to revolutionize SHM by providing real-time assessment of buildings and infrastructure during and after earthquakes. Additionally, AI-based methods will be implemented to evaluate the combined effects of earthquakes and other hazards, such as tsunamis, landslides, and floods, by modeling their complex interactions and impacts on the built environment. It is noteworthy that Generative AI, or AI Generated Content (AIGC), offers numerous opportunities to revolutionize many fields, including earthquake engineering. For example, AIGC can automate the generation of structural layout designs that use appropriate materials and maintain desired performance levels under earthquake loading. Additionally, AIGC can facilitate rapid digital prototyping by automatically populating design spaces and identifying the solution(s) that minimizes cost and environmental impacts while achieving the desired performance objectives. The integration of AI into earthquake engineering is poised to transform the field, enabling more accurate predictions, innovative designs, and enhanced infrastructure resilience to seismic hazards. However, as AI techniques continue to develop, researchers and practitioners must collaborate closely to ensure the successful implementation of these methods. It is through this collaboration that the full potential of AI will be leveraged to mitigate the risks associated with earthquakes and related hazards. The guest editors would like to thank Masayoshi Nakashima, the Executive Editor, for his leadership of the journal and the support and guidance provided for this Special Issue. Additionally, the overwhelming response of the earthquake engineering research community to the call for papers as part of this special issue is acknowledged. Finally, this issue, as well as all refereed journals, would not be possible without the diligent reviews provided by peers within the earthquake engineering community. As such, the guest editors wish to thank the individuals that participated in the review process.