Tubal Pregnancy Complicated with Rudimentary Horn: Two Case Reports and Literature Review

Hengxi Chen,Eranga Abeysundera,Tian,Xiaorong Qi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/gpm-21-43
2022-01-01
Gynecology and Pelvic Medicine
Abstract:Background: Although tubal pregnancy is the most common ectopic pregnancy, tubal pregnancy in a unicornuate uterus with rudimentary horn has rarely been documented. It is worth discussing whether it is beneficial to remove the rudimentary horn simultaneously during tubal pregnancy operation. Case Description: Two women were confirmed to be pregnant by blood beta-human chorionic gonadotrophin (beta-HCG). Transvaginal ultrasonography revealed no gestational sac in the uterine cavity and inhomogeneous hyperechoic mass with surrounding vascularity signal in the adnexal area. A hypoechoic mass connecting to the uterus represented rudimentary horn. Diagnosed laparoscopy were performed and the patients were diagnosed with ectopic pregnancy and rudimentary horn. Due to abdominal pain and the major risk of pregnancy in the rudimentary horn, we removed the cavitated rudimentary horns following the wishes of the patient and her family. The patients' postoperative course was uneventful, and she left the hospital in good condition. Conclusions: Ectopic pregnancy might occur in both fallopian tubes regardless of the subtype of rudimentary horn. It is recommended to excise a cavitated rudimentary horn due to abdominal pain and the major risk of pregnancy in the rudimentary horn. It is also expected that this removal would prevent torsion of the rudimentary horn and neoplastic diseases, from which even the non-lumen rudimentary horn might benefit. Concomitant rudimentary horn excision and tubal pregnancy surgery might save the patients from re-operation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?