Craniometrics Reveal “Two Layers” of Prehistoric Human Dispersal in Eastern Eurasia
Hirofumi Matsumura,Hsiao-chun Hung,Charles Higham,Chi Zhang,Mariko Yamagata,Lan Cuong Nguyen,Zhen Li,Xue-chun Fan,Truman Simanjuntak,Adhi Agus Oktaviana,Jia-ning He,Chung-yu Chen,Chien-kuo Pan,Gang He,Guo-ping Sun,Wei-jin Huang,Xin-wei Li,Xing-tao Wei,Kate Domett,Siân Halcrow,Kim Dung Nguyen,Hoang Hiep Trinh,Chi Hoang Bui,Khanh Trung Kien Nguyen,Andreas Reinecke
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35426-z
IF: 4.6
2019-02-05
Scientific Reports
Abstract:This cranio-morphometric study emphasizes a “two-layer model” for eastern Eurasian anatomically modern human (AMH) populations, based on large datasets of 89 population samples including findings directly from ancient archaeological contexts. Results suggest that an initial “first layer” of AMH had related closely to ancestral Andaman, Australian, Papuan, and Jomon groups who likely entered this region via the Southeast Asian landmass, prior to 65–50 kya. A later “second layer” shared strong cranial affinities with Siberians, implying a Northeast Asian source, evidenced by 9 kya in central China and then followed by expansions of descendant groups into Southeast Asia after 4 kya. These two populations shared limited initial exchange, and the second layer grew at a faster rate and in greater numbers, linked with contexts of farming that may have supported increased population densities. Clear dichotomization between the two layers implies a temporally deep divergence of distinct migration routes for AMH through both southern and northern Eurasia.
multidisciplinary sciences