Abstract:Due to the escalating occurrence and high casualty rates of accidents involving Electric Two-Wheelers (E2Ws), it has become a major safety concern on the roads. Additionally, with the widespread adoption of current autonomous driving technology, a greater challenge has arisen for the safety of vulnerable road participants. Most existing trajectory planning methods primarily focus on the safety, comfort, and dynamics of autonomous vehicles themselves, often overlooking the protection of vulnerable road users (VRUs), typically E2W riders. This paper aims to investigate the kinematic response of E2Ws in vehicle collisions, including the 15 ms Head Injury Criterion (HIC15). It analyzes the impact of key collision parameters on head injuries, establishes injury prediction models for anticipated scenarios, and proposes a trajectory planning framework for autonomous vehicles based on predicting head injuries of VRUs. Firstly, a multi-rigid-body model of two-wheeler-vehicle collision was established based on a real accident database, incorporating four critical collision parameters (initial collision velocity, initial collision position, and collision angle). The accuracy of the multi-rigid-body model was validated through verifications with real fatal accidents to parameterize the collision scenario. Secondly, a large-scale effective crash dataset has been established by the multi-parameterized crash simulation automation framework combined with Monte Carlo sampling algorithm. The training and testing of the injury prediction model were implemented based on the MLP + XGBoost regression algorithm on this dataset to explore the potential relationship between the head injuries of the E2W riders and the crash variables. Finally, based on the proposed injury prediction model, this paper generated a trajectory planning framework for autonomous vehicles based on head collision injury prediction for VRUs, aiming to achieve a fair distribution of collision risks among road users. The accident reconstruction results show that the maximum error in the final relative positions of the E2W, the car, and the E2W rider compared to the real accident scene is 11 %, demonstrating the reliability of the reconstructed model. The injury prediction results indicate that the MLP + XGBoost regression prediction model used in this article achieved an R2 of 0.92 on the test set. Additionally, the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed trajectory planning algorithm were validated in a manually designed autonomous driving traffic flow scenario.

Motion Planning of Vehicles for Crash Mitigation in Emergency Driving Scenarios

Vehicle Motion Planning for Crash Mitigation in Unavoidable Collision Scenarios

Vehicle crash mitigation strategy in unavoidable collision scenarios: focusing on motion planning by considering a generalized crash severity model

Crash Mitigation in Motion Planning for Autonomous Vehicles

Motion Planning Based on Steering Obstacle Avoidance Under Emergency Conditions

Surrounding Vehicles Motion Prediction for Risk Assessment and Motion Planning of Autonomous Vehicle in Highway Scenarios

Drive with Quantified Risk: A Probabilistic Approach for Occlusion-Aware Trajectory Planning

An Emergency Operation Strategy and Motion Planning Method for Autonomous Vehicle in Emergency Scenarios

Post-Impact Motion Planning and Tracking Control for Autonomous Vehicles

Trajectory Planning and Safety Assessment of Autonomous Vehicles Based on Motion Prediction and Model Predictive Control.

Computational Efficient Motion Planning Method for Automated Vehicles Considering Dynamic Obstacle Avoidance and Traffic Interaction

Human-like motion planning of autonomous vehicle based on probabilistic trajectory prediction

Integrated Post-Impact Planning and Active Safety Control for Autonomous Vehicles

Towards Safe Motion Planning for Autonomous Driving in Highway

Collision Avoidance Motion Planning for Connected and Automated Vehicle Platoon Merging and Splitting with a Hybrid Automaton Architecture

A Hierarchical Motion Planning System for Driving in Changing Environments: Framework, Algorithms, and Verifications

IA Planner: Motion Planning Using Instantaneous Analysis for Autonomous Vehicle in the Dense Dynamic Scenarios on Highways

Trajectory planning framework for autonomous vehicles based on collision injury prediction for vulnerable road users

Occlusion-aware collision avoidance trajectory planning with potential collision risk assessment for autonomous vehicle

Surrounding Vehicle Trajectory Prediction and Dynamic Speed Planning for Autonomous Vehicle in Cut-in Scenarios

Motion Planning for Autonomous Vehicles in Uncertain Environments Using Hierarchical Distributional Reinforcement Learning