Abstract:Heterogeneous defect prediction (HDP) has become a very active research field in software engineering, which predicts the maximum number of bug-suspiciousness modules of a target project by prediction models built on source project with heterogeneous metric set. At present, some researchers have proposed some HDP models with a promising performance. Most of existing HDP models adopted unsupervised transfer learning to map source project and target project into the same feature space, which only considered the metrics space, not the label information from source project and few part of target project. Meanwhile, the predictive ability of these HDP models in effort-aware context have not been compared. Therefore, we set up to investigate the effectiveness of label information on HDP, and to propose a HDP model for improving the predicting performance in classification and effort-aware contexts. In order to use these label information, we propose a novel conditional domain adversarial adaptation (CDAA) approach to tackle heterogeneous problem in SDP, which is motivated by generative adversarial networks (GANs). There are three networks in architecture of our CDAA, including one generator, one discriminator and one classifier. The generator learns how to transfer source instance space to target instance space. The discriminator learns how to identify the fake instances generated by generator. The classifier learns how to correctly classify the label of instances. In our CDAA, the loss function of classifier and discriminator are both back propagate to generator. Then, to ensure a fair comparison between state-of-the art methods and CDAA, we take AUC, MCC and $P_{opt}$ as measures to evaluate 28 open-source projects. Experimental results demonstrate that CDAA method could take advantage of label information to effectively map source project to target project and improve the predictive performance. Also, experimental results demonstrate that our CDAA method is not affected by the number of same metrics between source project and target project.

Joint Domain Adaption and Pseudo-Labeling for Cross-Project Defect Prediction

Landmark-Based Domain Adaptation and Selective Pseudo-Labeling for Heterogeneous Defect Prediction

Balanced Adversarial Tight Matching for Cross‐Project Defect Prediction

Conditional Domain Adversarial Adaptation for Heterogeneous Defect Prediction.

Defect Category Prediction Based on Multi-Source Domain Adaptation

DSSDPP: Data Selection and Sampling Based Domain Programming Predictor for Cross-Project Defect Prediction

Federated Domain Adaptation via Pseudo-label Refinement

Cross Project Defect Prediction via Balanced Distribution Adaptation Based Transfer Learning

Towards Cross-Project Defect Prediction with Imbalanced Feature Sets

Generative Adversarial Network-based Cross-Project Fault Prediction

Cross-Project Defect Prediction Based on Two-Phase Feature Importance Amplification

UDA-DP: Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Software Defect Prediction

Joint Instance and Feature Adaptation for Heterogeneous Defect Prediction

Enhancing Cross-Project Just-In-Time Defect Prediction with Active Deep Learning

MHCPDP: multi-source heterogeneous cross-project defect prediction via multi-source transfer learning and autoencoder

Cross-Project Software Defect Prediction Based on SMOTE and Deep Canonical Correlation Analysis

S<SUP>2</SUP>LMMD: Cross-Project Software Defect Prediction via Statement Semantic Learning and Maximum Mean Discrepancy

Unsupervised Deep Domain Adaptation for Heterogeneous Defect Prediction

Cross-Project and Within-Project Semi-Supervised Software Defect Prediction Problems Study Using a Unified Solution

MBL-CPDP: A Multi-objective Bilevel Method for Cross-Project Defect Prediction via Automated Machine Learning