Conspiracy Theories: Groups, Ideology, and Status as Three Distinct Bases for Expressions in Society
Jia-Yan Mao,Jan-Willem van Prooijen,Paul A. M. Van Lange
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214241280742
IF: 7.867
2024-10-28
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Abstract:Current Directions in Psychological Science, Ahead of Print. Conspiracy theories have been treated mostly as a homogeneous phenomenon in empirical research. However, to fully understand their causes and consequences, a multifaceted approach to conspiracy theories would be useful. Here, we propose an organizational framework with three facets (groups, ideology, and status) to conceptualize conspiracy theories. Based on a review of recent research, the current contribution highlights the psychological differences between (a) perceived conspiracies within or outside of one's valued community; (b) ideological versus nonideological conspiracy beliefs, based on whether conspiracy beliefs are directly relevant for people's core values; and (c) upward versus downward conspiracy beliefs, that is, whether the perceived conspiracy involves a relatively high- or low-status group. Finally, we discuss some distinct consequences of these facets in affecting societally consequential behaviors, such as collective action, protest, hostility, or polarization.
psychology, multidisciplinary