Parasite stress and pathogen avoidance relate to distinct dimensions of political ideology across 30 nations
Joshua M. Tybur,Yoel Inbar,Lene Aarøe,Pat Barclay,Fiona Kate Barlow,Mícheál de Barra,D. Vaughn Becker,Leah Borovoi,Incheol Choi,Jong An Choi,Nathan S. Consedine,Alan Conway,Jane Rebecca Conway,Paul Conway,Vera Cubela Adoric,Dilara Ekin Demirci,Ana María Fernández,Diogo Conque Seco Ferreira,Keiko Ishii,Ivana Jakšić,Tingting Ji,Florian van Leeuwen,David M. G. Lewis,Norman P. Li,Jason C. McIntyre,Sumitava Mukherjee,Justin H. Park,Boguslaw Pawlowski,Michael Bang Petersen,David Pizarro,Gerasimos Prodromitis,Pavol Prokop,Markus J. Rantala,Lisa M. Reynolds,Bonifacio Sandin,Bariş Sevi,Delphine De Smet,Narayanan Srinivasan,Shruti Tewari,Cameron Wilson,Jose C. Yong,Iris Žeželj
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1607398113
IF: 11.1
2016-10-17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Abstract:Significance Pathogens, and antipathogen behavioral strategies, affect myriad aspects of human behavior. Recent findings suggest that antipathogen strategies relate to political attitudes, with more ideologically conservative individuals reporting more disgust toward pathogen cues, and with higher parasite stress nations being, on average, more conservative. However, no research has yet adjudicated between two theoretical accounts proposed to explain these relationships between pathogens and politics. We find that national parasite stress and individual disgust sensitivity relate more strongly to adherence to traditional norms than they relate to support for barriers between social groups. These results suggest that the relationship between pathogens and politics reflects intragroup motivations more than intergroup motivations.