Impact of Stage Shift on the Population Mortality for Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Xiaoke Zhu,Jian Zhou,Liang Zhou,Ming Zhang,Chunli Gao,Lei Tao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4074564
2022-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:Background: The population mortality of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) shows no sign of decreasing despite the incidence decreases and the treatment advances. We aims to assess the impact of stage shift in attenuating the survival improvement among patients with LSCC. Methods: This study was conducted using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database to collect data of LSCC patients from 2007 to 2017. The trend of clinical stage shift and its association with population mortaliy were investigated by estimating the average annual percentage changes and performing Cox regression analyses. Findings: A total of 21,160 patients with LSCC were enrolled in this study. A significant correlation between the stage at diagnosis and the year of diagnosis was observed: the proportion of patients diagnosed with LSCC at stage I/II decreased from 53.0% in 2007 to 44.7% in 2017, paralleling to the AAPC of -1.52%; while the proportion at stage III/IV increased obviously from 44.5% to 51.0% (AAPC, 1.34%). The COX regression analyses revealed that the year of diagnosis was a significant prognostic factor for OS (HR: 0.992, p=.021) and CSS (HR: 0.987, p=.002) when adjusted by clinical stage. The cause-of-death analysis showed that the proportion of patients dying of cancer decreased in recent years (2012-2017), while the proportion of patients dying from non-cancer causes increased relatively. Interpretation: The results show that stage shift can explain the changeless mortality of LSCC to some extent, and highlight the necessity of comprehensive primary care for patients with LSCC during the survival period. Funding: Science and Technology Committee of Shanghai (Grant No. 20MC1920200).Declaration of Interest: The authors declare no competing interests.Ethical Approval: These data are de-identified and thus exempt from informed consent or the approval of the institutional review board.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?