Dual Interface-Engineered Tin Heterostructure for Enhanced Ambient Ammonia Electrosynthesis
Qinglin Li,Yinpan Zhang,Xiaoxue Wang,Yong Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c01160
2021-03-26
Abstract:Electrocatalytic nitrogen reduction reaction (NRR) represents a promising alternative route for sustainable ammonia synthesis, which currently dominantly relies on the energy-intensive Haber–Bosch process, while it is significantly hampered by the sluggish reaction kinetics due to the short of glorious electrocatalysts. In this work, we report an efficient porous tin heterostructure with intimate dual interfaces for electrosynthesis of ammonia, which exhibits outstanding NRR efficiency with an NH<sub>3</sub> yield rate and Faradaic efficiency as high as 30.3 μg h<sup>–1</sup>mg<sup>–1</sup><sub>cat</sub> and 41.3%, respectively, and excellent stability as well at a low potential of −0.05 V (vs RHE) in 0.1 M Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> solution under ambient conditions. This matrix value is superior to the analogue Sn-based heterostructures with a single interface and outperforms the currently state-of-the-art Sn-based catalysts. Comprehensive characterizations and theoretical calculations uncovered the formation of the unique intimate dual interfaces in the tin heterostructure promoting the enhancement of the NRR process, which not only effectively exposes more active sites for stronger N<sub>2</sub> chemisorption and activation but also accelerates the interfacial electron transfer and reduces the free energy barrier for the rate-determining *N<sub>2</sub>H formation step, highlighting the importance of the dual interface effect for the design of electrocatalysts in catalysis.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acsami.1c01160?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.1c01160</a>.Characterization; computational methods; SEM images of the obtained biochar derived from the bamboo shoots after the hydrothermal process; XRD patterns and Raman spectra for the , SnO<sub>2</sub>/NC, and Sn–SnO<sub>2</sub>/NC sample; HRTEM images of the SnO<sub>2</sub>/NC sample; N<sub>2</sub> physical absorption–desorption analysis for the SnO<sub>2</sub>/NC, Sn–SnO<sub>2</sub>/NC, and Sn/NC sample; XPS survey spectra, Sn 3d, O 1s, and N 1s for Sn/NC, SnO<sub>2</sub>/NC, and Sn–SnO<sub>2</sub>/NC, respectively; illustration of the H-cell with a three-electrode cell and the working electrode connections of the NRR process; UV–vis absorption spectra of the electrolytes stained with indophenol indicator and Watt and Chrisp assays for the detected N<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub> byproduct for Sn–SnO<sub>2</sub>/NC electrolysis at various potentials; HRTEM images of the used Sn–SnO<sub>2</sub>/NC sample, XRD patterns, and Sn 3d XPS spectra for the fresh and used Sn–SnO<sub>2</sub>/NC catalyst; N<sub>2</sub>-TPD spectra of Sn/NC, SnO<sub>2</sub>/NC, and Sn–SnO<sub>2</sub>/NC; UV–vis absorption spectra for the indophenol assays with NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> ions after being incubated for 1 h and the concentration–absorbance curve of NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> ions with a series of standard concentration at 0.1 M Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> solution; UV–vis absorption spectra of Watt and Chrisp assays with N<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub> after being incubated for 2 h and the concentration–absorbance curve of N<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub> solution with a series of standard concentration at 0.1 M Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> solution; <sup>1</sup>H NMR spectra of various concentrations of the standard <sup>14</sup>NH<sub>4</sub> solution and its corresponding standard curve; <sup>1</sup>H NMR spectra of the electrolyte and its corresponding concentration of <sup>14</sup>NH<sub>4</sub> electrolyzed by Sn–SnO<sub>2</sub>/NC at a potential of −0.05 V vs RHE; <sup>1</sup>H NMR spectra of various concentrations of the standard <sup>15</sup>NH<sub>4</sub> solution and its corresponding standard curve; <sup>1</sup>H NMR spectra of the electrolyte and its corresponding concentration of <sup>15</sup>NH<sub>4</sub> electrolyzed by Sn–SnO2/NC at a potential of −0.05 V vs RHE; NRR reaction pathways and the corresponding atomistic structures for Sn/NC, SnO<sub>2</sub>/NC, and Sn–SnO<sub>2</sub>/NC; comparison of this work with other recently reported Sn-based NRR; <i>R</i><sub>s</sub>, <i>R</i><sub>ct</sub>, and <i>Z</i><sub>w</sub> of the SnO<sub>2</sub>/NC, Sn–SnO2/NC, and Sn/NC; and elemental analysis and N<sub>2</sub> physical adsorption–desorption analysis for Sn/NC, Sn–SnO<sub>2</sub>/NC, and SnO<sub>2</sub>/NC (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsami.1c01160/suppl_file/am1c01160_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
materials science, multidisciplinary,nanoscience & nanotechnology