Preoperative High-Resolution Ultrasound for the Assessment of Macro-Metastatic Central Lymph Nodes Sublevel-By-Sublevel in Unilateral Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma

Wen Tan,Lingli Xiao,Shiwen Zhang,Haoming Zheng,Sheng Li,Yu Zhang,Ankui Yang,Jianhua Zhou,Longzhong Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-746447/v1
2022-01-01
Abstract:Background To understand the diagnostic efficacy of preoperative high-resolution ultrasound (HRUS) in the diagnosis of macro-metastatic central lymph node (macro-CLNM), It will help surgeons decide whether to perform prophylactic lymph nodes (LNs) dissection in patients with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC).Methods This study analyzed the preoperative ultrasound and postoperative pathological results of central lymph nodes sublevel-by-sublevel of 220 patients with unilateral PTMC. These patients all underwent surgery at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from January 2015 to November 2019. Results In the right paratracheal, the left paratracheal, the pretracheal, and the prelaryngeal level, the mean number of lymph nodes are 0.9, 1.9, 3.3, and 4.6, respectively, and the macro-metastasis rate are 0.91%, 6.36%, 6.73%, and 11.21%, respectively. For metastasis central lymph nodes (CLNM), the HRUS diagnostic efficacy in the four sublevels was low, with the AUC of 0.50-0.54. When the diagnosis object was changed from CLNM to macro-CLNM, the AUC of the ipsilateral paratracheal sublevel has been significantly improved, with 0.80 (95% CI 0.71-0.87) on the left and 0.75 (95% CI 0.67-0.83) on the right. Meanwhile, the negative predictive value (NPV) of ultrasound diagnosis of macrometastasis in ipsilateral paratracheal sublevel reached 99% and 95%.Conclusions The number and macro-metastasis rate of lymph nodes in PTMC patients are, from high to low, the right paratracheal, the left paratracheal, the pretracheal, and the prelaryngeal level. Preoperative HRUS has a high diagnostic efficiency for macro-CLNM in the ipsilateral paratracheal area; when the ultrasound diagnosis of the ipsilateral paratracheal area is negative, the probability of macrometastasis is extremely low.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?