Abstract:The present editorial team has now coordinated the Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology (JCASP) for 3 years. We have taken the journal in a precise direction towards increasing the volume and quality of articles, many of which articulate clear and positive societal and community impacts. In this editorial, we present JCASP's revised and expanded scope and the orientations and activities that are being undertaken in support of new initiatives. The editorial team welcomes research from all areas of community and social psychology. We accept empirical, theoretical, and methodological articles, and welcome a wide range of methodologies, including quantitative (Pecini et al., 2022), qualitative (Varma & Siromahov, 2023), and mixed methods research (Kothari, Fischer, Mullican, Lipscomb, & Jaramillo, 2022), as well as correlational (Gray, Randell, Manning, & Cleveland, 2023), longitudinal (Joshanloo, 2022), and experimental designs (Mäkinen et al., 2022). Relatedly, we have expanded the types of articles that we accept. In addition to research papers and commentaries traditionally accepted by this journal, we will now consider meta-analyses and reviews (Cadamuro et al., 2021). Importantly, however, these should be directly relevant for the advancement of community and social psychology praxis. Reviews should not just be a summary of research, they should also provide an analysis that creates a framework for understanding the literature regarding the focal topic and present potential to advance the field. Now we also welcome replication studies, which can strengthen the external validity of research results, and registered reports (requiring authors to submit the theoretical rationale and study plan before collecting the data), which contribute to increasing the transparency of research. In the case of registered reports, full articles will be published, independently of whether results support the hypotheses. Finally, we also welcome short research-based policy briefs that summarise key findings and present options for application at the level of policy and/or community action. We have recently undergone a re-scope that meaningfully expanded our original scope. JCASP does not only qualify as an applied journal but considers all areas of social psychology, giving special importance to work that is directly or indirectly relevant to communities. Our focus is on how the social context and community processes can influence the mind and behaviour within a given social system at the individual, group or institutional level. While a study should be theoretically motivated on the basis of existing theories and empirical evidence, and provide advancement to the field, the fact that it is field-based and/or has clear theoretical implications is especially valued at JCASP. We do not believe in the dichotomy between theory and practice, rather we think that these dimensions of scholarship are the two sides of the same coin (cf. Vezzali & Stathi, 2021). As an example, Cocco et al. (2023) advanced knowledge of the application of the vicarious contact construct, based on the idea that observing positive contact between two groups can improve intergroup relations (Vezzali, Hewstone, Capozza, Giovannini, & Wölfer, 2014; Wright, Aron, McLaughlin-Volpe, & Ropp, 1997). The idea was extended to the phenomenon of group-based bullying, which is bullying directed at certain groups. To adapt the construct to young children, the authors created ad hoc fairy tales incorporating the principles of vicarious contact, finding that a field intervention was effective in fostering bystanders' intentions to counteract interethnic bullying, as well as the underlying psychological processes. JCASP is an author-friendly journal: we do not set a target rejection rate, and we look for reasons to accept a paper and not motivations to reject it. We also do not require a specific format. Our support team can help authors with formatting issues: we are interested in the quality and impact of articles. We value good research: if the theoretical rationale is good, methods are sound and conclusions are evidence-based—we want to help disseminate the work. In other words, we do not reject good scientific articles only because they do not have sufficient innovation: replication studies or solid scientific studies with an incremental contribution to the literature are highly appreciated. We believe that social psychological and applied research can significantly contribute to the advancement of knowledge and praxis, creating new theories that can be of direct relevance to community well-being, and therefore we value theoretical novelty. Note that novelty does not merely rest on new findings: it can also be provided by an innovative methodological design, replication of previous results, or providing confidence in findings across a number of independent studies. We value targeted special issues. In the last 3 years, we have published special issues on key topics of community and applied social psychology, including social inclusion for LGBTQ communities (‘Stonewall uprising: 50 years later—Emerging challenges for LGBTQ communities around the world’), challenging injustice to foster bystander interventions (‘Challenging injustice: Understanding upstanding, civic action, and bystander intervention to promote justice’), facing COVID-19 pandemic at the community level (‘The societal relevance of communities in the COVID-19 era’). We are also currently running a variety of special issues focused on different facets of the promotion of community well-being. One special issue is dedicated to research featured in or inspired by the 5th International Conference on Social Identity and Health. A further special issue concerns the understanding of multiculturality (‘Multicultural identities in context: The influence of social, community, environmental and historical factors’). We have recently launched a call for a special issue on how sport can be used to benefit communities (‘Sport for the community: Psychological and sociomoral benefits of sport participation in youth and adult communities’), with the idea that sport can be a valuable tool that our societies can use to face relevant social issues. A further special issue relates to the impact of modern technologies on the work of psychologists (‘Community psychology in the era of hybrid real-world settings: How modern technologies have changed individuals' experiences and psychologists' work’). The more recent special issue that we launched aims to investigate the phenomenon of collective action to produce social equality (‘Promoting social change through collective action locally, nationally, and globally’). JCASP also has happily joined the ‘Gender equality in education’ multi-journal special issue promoted by Wiley and includes 24 journals, an innovative way to obtain a rich and interdisciplinary issue on a key societal topic. Special issues are especially valued in this journal, because these collections provide the opportunity for geographically dispersed scholars to come together to share their work on particular topics within the domain of social and community psychology. For this reason, we have a continuously open call for proposals, with the aim of collecting new and exciting ideas for special issues that can be of interest to academics as well as to practitioners. The last topic that we would like to discuss in this editorial relates to the relevance of JCASP to our communities, including stakeholders and practitioners. Although an academic journal has research as its primary aim, JCASP also wishes to publish research that is useful to communities, providing scientifically based indications on how to benefit individuals, groups, and communities. To this end, there has been an increase in open access articles published in JCASP, which will be of interest to both academics and non-academics. However, the language of science is often technical in nature and can be difficult to read and understand for non-specialist audiences. Non-specialists who are interested in learning the developments of science in the field of social and community psychology might benefit from efforts to ‘translate’ theoretical ideas, methods and research findings into more accessible formats. For this reason, 3 years ago we launched the ‘social impact statement,’ consisting of a file for dissemination, which is freely accessible and voluntarily provided as supplementary material, where authors can summarise their article and provide concrete evidence-based recommendations that can be immediately translated into practice. Given the aims of the journal, we strongly encourage the authors to include such summaries in their articles. We are also about to launch a new initiative, with the aim of creating a community interested in sharing and learning from social practices that provide meaning to our scholarship. We are specifically thinking about creating a section where authors can disclose all that is behind the scenes of a field intervention (for instance) with which contributors are engaged. As an example, a prejudice-reduction intervention in schools often requires discussions with school managers, teachers and parents, but possibly also events to publicly launch it in collaboration with relevant institutions. While in the scientific article the procedure and results are the main elements of the study that are disclosed, the intervention may have produced far more noteworthy outcomes beyond the hypothesized effects. This might include increases in participants' motivations towards schoolwork, greater social cohesion or practical issues resolved (e.g., conflicts at the class level). To motivate schools, the intervention may have resulted in material produced by participants, diplomas for participating children awarded in a ceremony, and an event to involve students, parents, communities and media. Sometimes, what is behind (and around) a study can be of as much if not more importance than specific scientific findings. We want to give voice to these experiences, which can inspire researchers who may be grappling with similar processes, and to foreground the community and societal relevance of applied scholarship. Finally, we still believe in a better world, and in the role of social and community psychology in creating it. The Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology wants to be home to scholars and practitioners who share this perspective.

Abstract:These are unprecedented times of prominent structural changes and uncertainties as societies, economies, cultures, and human-environment relations adapt and reconfigure in various ways. The global pandemic has brought us to a place of urgency and reflection that exposes and has intensified longer-term concerns about the climate emergency, rising levels of economic austerity, altered geopolitical alliances, and infrastructural changes including those driven by technology and science. These issues are refracted through long histories of raced, classed, gendered, and other inequalities as seen in the outcomes of the pandemic. Black, Asian, and minority ethnic lives have been lost at higher than average rates in some countries exposing the nexus of race and low-paid casualised work, and the risks this involves. Moreover, the pandemic also showed us how immobility was a luxury that some people could afford, while others, such as internal migrants, whose livelihoods were threatened, were forced to move back to places that could still sustain them. The centrality of social reproduction – what needs to continue to be done – means that lesser skilled workers became so-called key or critical workers but without the necessary support or rewards that the ‘key’ suggests. Moreover, these tensions have been reflected during the last year in the unprecedented response to the death of George Floyd in the USA, and the ensuing protests and social practices demanding that Black Lives Matter. At best it has led to reviews of how structural racism has embedded and enabled existing power hierarchies to stabilise and expand and the crucial necessity of addressing this head on for a more progressive future. Deep reflection, empathy, change, and review is required if societies and natural environments are to reboot, survive, and thrive in the post-pandemic world. Even before the profound disruptive effects of COVID-19, it was clear that dramatic transformations to environmental (e.g., extreme weather, climate change, access to clean water, plastic-less environments, carbon sequestration), political (e.g., populism, global security and terrorism), social (e.g., race relations and justice, ageing populations, inequalities and poverty), economic (e.g., artificial intelligence and data, food security) and cultural (e.g., cyberspace and social media, automated vehicles and travel) conditions were unfolding. These issues present numerous inter-connected challenges for the 21st century. Together they will have a marked geographical footprint in the future to where, why, and how new societal, economic, cultural, environmental, and political formations are forged in light of deep underlying processes of change and reproduction. In this contemporary moment of both intense change and the continuation of longstanding structural violence and injustice, our aim is for The Geographical Journal to serve as a space for critical engagement and positive proposal on ‘public issues’ – matters that are of importance and relevance to interested or affected publics. This framing builds on the established strengths of the journal – with a reputation for engaged, relevant work, international scholarship, and a readership that is both global and embracing of academic and non-academic audiences. We are open to what counts as public issues, with the term being deliberately broad. We seek to attract and publish the most interesting, inventive work on the widest possible range of public issues – from species loss to domestic violence, racial surveillance to racial violence, the new green deal to Islamophobia, global south mega projects to automation, indigenous rights to the MeToo movement, water security to the culture wars, and much more. As this indicative list shows, public issues might be the ‘grand socio-environmental challenges’ that attract attention and are already subject to concerted action. We will, for example, continue the tradition of The Geographical Journal as being a space for the very best work exploring the intersection between development and environment, as climate change drives new geographies of damage and loss, as well as new ways of living. We also invite research on the geographies of resource extraction and use that are profoundly reshaping flows of material and energy, to give another example of an emergent public issue. And we expect the journal will address the important changes to urban life, including the new geographies of density and sprawl. But as our suggested agenda highlights, public issues are not restricted to those that already attract attention and global action, nor are they necessarily global. So, we also want The Geographical Journal to be a space where we collectively anticipate what might become a public issue, and attempt to diagnose, understand, and intervene in ethical and political concerns or problems as they emerge. Thus, we want to make issues that are simmering, or ought to be given airtime, public. With this in mind, we encourage work on forgotten, marginalised, and silenced issues from the global south and global north, as well as incipient themes. We want to showcase work on both the problems and concerns that have gathered attention and action and the many public issues which have yet to cross a threshold of visibility, but we anticipate may do so, or argue should do. This is important for geographical scholarship to be even more valuable, impactful, and relevant for effectively informing and shaping policy and practice to address the challenges of this century. What excites us about the journal as we move forward, then, is the chance to demonstrate the difference geographical dimensions can make to reflective thought and action across a spectrum of concerns and problems. We believe The Geographical Journal should be a journal for the whole discipline, where new ways of framing and thinking about contemporary public issues are presented, different voices and positions are juxtaposed in dialogue and disagreement, and transformations in practice, activism, and policy are critically analysed and advocated. This means we are keen to encourage more work from subdisciplines, as well as non-academic voices, whether they be activist, policy makers, NGO workers, or others. The reach of The Geographical Journal – in terms of non-academic subscribers and global readership – gives the publication a unique platform to showcase different kinds of public geography and new ways of thinking and acting. More specially, we want to encourage papers that do three things. First, the publications should strive to bring the best of geographical scholarship to bear on contemporary public concerns with the aim of generating new understanding and action around an issue. Too often geographical writing reconfirms what we already know. As well as encouraging submissions from all subdisciplines (and from beyond geography), we want to support and publish work that takes risks, that thinks and acts with new conceptual or methodological resources to understand the issues that matter to people’s lives and resonate with non-academic actors and audiences. This means we expect the writings to draw on a diversity of relevant approaches, including research and scholarship from across the globe. These are necessary for making sense of today’s important public issues. Second, as well as diagnosing and understanding public issues and their geographies, we hope that some papers will be orientated towards the future and how change might happen. How this is done will depend on the conventions of different styles of work, authors’ ethical and political commitments and interests, and the specific issues being addressed. It may, for example, involve calling for new practical or policy solutions to seemingly intractable problems. It could require evaluating specific policy initiatives and proposals and making recommendations for improvement. Alternatively, it may entail showcasing the efforts that are underway by community groups and activists to improvise changes that address ongoing structural violence. Or it may involve authors producing creative work that is deliberately utopian or speculates in order to change what seems possible around an issue. There are many ways of addressing the futures that surround public issues, and we encourage authors to see the journal as a home for experimentation with future orientated modes of inquiry that extend beyond description, interpretation, and explanation. Third, we hope that the journal becomes a space to advance the exchange of geographical knowledge(s) between academic and relevant non-academic actors, such as professional geographers, activists, institutional actors (e.g. government officials and civil servants, think-tanks), the private and voluntary sectors. We are open to new constituencies and actors – the substantive focus of the work, and fresh perspectives are what matter. But we start from the principle that much is to be gained through exchange and co-production. Alongside traditional academic papers, we, therefore, welcome co-produced work and engagements in the journal between academics and non-academics. A number of Themed Sections have also been commissioned and are in progress, which exemplify this type of work. In the pipeline for publication are themed issues on the important topics of ‘Food geographies in, of, and for the Anthropocene’ and ‘The new geopolitics of the Arctic.’ As well as inviting papers from across the disciplines, we also encourage short (up to 4,000 word) commentaries addressing contemporary public issues. A good commentary will articulate a specific approach to a topic, saying something distinctive and novel that stimulates further thought and reflection. We hope commentaries will come from all parts of our readership – academics at all career stages and throughout the world, but also non-academics – and we will aim to fast track the review process. Future editorials will elaborate upon our agenda. For now, we invite submissions from people across all subdisciplines working on existing and incipient ‘public issues.’ We are committed to making The Geographical Journal into an inclusive space for critical reflection and experimentation on how geographical research, praxis and thinking can make a difference to policy and action around the important issues that are making and remaking worlds.

Public Health Challenges: A New Scientific Path and Platform

Advancing Science and Creating a Scientifically Informed Community at JCASP

The Future of the Geographical Journal: Engaging with Public Issues

Welcome to Progress in Preventive Medicine from the Editorial Board

From Editor's Desk

Pediatric Discovery: Opportunities and Challenges in Pediatric Medicine

Geography and Environment: A Time of Change

Editorial: Contributing to the Growth of Scientific Journals in Ethiopia

The Innovation: A Journal to See the Unseen and Change the Unchanged

COVID-19 Pandemic and Research Publications; Necessity of Maintaining Scientific Integrity

New directions for the Journal of Health Psychology

Mitigating the detrimental effects of COVID-19 pandemic on scientific production

Scientific journals should be transformed into science storytellers to improve their visibility

“Catch-22” in Starting a New Science Journal (Editorial)

Introducing Our New Journal: Infectious Microbes & Diseases

Opportunities and challenges for China's scientific journal publishing in the new era

[Social Science editors in Public Health: practices and limits in the creation of a scientific habitus]

Opportunities and Challenges for China&rsquo;s Scientific Journal Publishing in the New Era

Truth and Transparency, Compromise and Climate Change

Case Reports and their impact on Journal Metrics, Researcher’s Indices, and other sundry issues

EDITORIAL: PIONEERING THE FUTURE OF HEALTHCARE THROUGH ADVANCES IN NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS