Asymmetric Switch Cost Between Subitizing and Estimation in Tactile Modality

Chunmiao Lou,Huanke Zeng,Lihan Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02858-w
IF: 2.8
2022-01-01
Current Psychology
Abstract:Subitizing (enumerating four or fewer objects) and estimation (enumerating five or more objects) are two rapid enumeration processes. The relationship between them remains undetermined, especially in tactile modality. The present study used a double enumeration paradigm to assess switch costs. In this paradigm, participants were required to enumerate two sequentially presented arrays of tactile stimuli, each with a set size either within or outside of a predetermined subitizing range. When enumeration process switched between subitizing and estimation, participants' response to the second array showed a higher error rate and worse precision, relative to no processing switch conditions. Meanwhile, the switch costs exhibited an asymmetry pattern - the switch from estimation to subitizing gave rise to a worse precision than the switch from subitizing to estimation did. During a switch from subitizing to estimation, the switch costs nearly vanished, since subitizing had already mobilized both approximate number representation system (ANS) and object individuation (OI). The switch costs also disappeared when inter-stimulus intervals (ISIs) between the two arrays were extended (i.e., preparation effect). Our results supported "dual component hypothesis" that subitizing activated OI and ANS processes while estimation only activated ANS, corresponding with evidence from visual modality. Taken together, the present findings suggest that tactile subitizing mobilizes both OI and ANS processes, and non-symbol number representation is modality-independent.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?