How Well Can a Convection-Permitting-modelling Improve the Simulation of Summer Precipitation Diurnal Cycle over the Tibetan Plateau?

Liu Zhaoyang,Gao Yanhong,Zhang Guo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-06090-3
IF: 4.901
2022-01-01
Climate Dynamics
Abstract:Precipitation is an essential contributor to the water resources over the Tibetan Plateau (TP). However, realistically simulating precipitation over the TP is still a major challenge for most models. In order to better depict the precipitation spatial and temporal distributions over the TP, a 4-km-resolution convection-permitting modelling (CPM) and a 28-km-resolution dynamical downscaling modelling (DDM) were applied to a summer season (from 1st June to 31st August 2014). The simulations and four other gridded datasets (APHRODITE, GPM, ERA-Interim and ERA5) were evaluated against station observations, in terms of monthly and seasonal mean precipitation amount, frequency, intensity and diurnal cycle. We found that the six datasets show considerable differences in precipitation amount, and these differences are mainly caused by the frequency. DDM shows substantial advantages in depicting precipitation over the reanalyses, in which significant overestimation of precipitation and an overly early diurnal peak dominate. However, the excessive daytime convective precipitation and stronger nocturnal precipitation still exit in DDM, which are mainly related to its strong convective available potential energy (CAPE) and nocturnal water vapor transport, respectively. The inaccurate early peak in DDM (1600 local solar time) is found to be related to the stronger moist convective instability at most stations and areas over the TP. Compared to DDM, CPM reduces the overestimation of precipitation over the northern and eastern TP and better captures the observed diurnal cycle. Moreover, CPM adds the most value in depicting the diurnal cycle in June, with the late afternoon precipitation maximum.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?